Search for: "In Re Barrett & Co."
Results 101 - 120
of 229
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2011, 7:05 am
’ And as is said in Barrett v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 4:30 am
[Co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in two faithless elector cases. [read post]
21 May 2024, 12:08 am
Big corporations try to co-opt and control these communities, and politicians often promote scary narratives about technology’s dangerous influences, but users have pushed back against monopoly and rhetoric to find new ways to connect with each other [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 11:18 pm
Co-blogger Steve Sachs describes the latest controversy from California: According to his official website, California Gov. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am
Readers interested in learning about another Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act case currently before the Supreme Court, Hungary v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 7:24 am
The individual defendants Donald Barrett and Robert Maihos co-own ITV Direct, Inc. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 10:01 pm
Under the proposed rule, shucked oysters — those that are taken out of their shells — are exempt because, for the most part, they’re cooked before they’re eaten. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
In Nebraska, Amy Coney Barrett wrote separately to condemn the stronger version of the MQD. [read post]
13 May 2020, 2:03 am
Co., No. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 8:30 am
Co., 2002-Ohio-2220, ¶ 15. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:03 am
Once you have shared User Content or made it public, that User Content may be re-shared by others. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 10:00 pm
” In a May 2011 ACC Docket article summarizing that event, Susan Hackett and her co-authors emphasized that progress will not be based on improved understanding or increased knowledge. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 8:55 am
Bucks Stove & Range Co., 221 U.S. 418, 442 (1911); accord, Barrett v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 7:58 am
Most important of those critics was Martin Rodger QC, Deputy President of the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), who tried to row back from 69 Marina in Barrett v Robinson [2014] UKUT 332 (LC); [2015] L&TR 1 (link to our note)* and limit the circumstances in which it could be used, but, ultimately, the Court of Appeal are binding on the UT, so we’re stuck with it. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 9:39 am
I thank Adam Liptak and the NYTimes for bringing up this interesting matter./3 — Seth Barrett Tillman (@SethBTillman) November 25, 2019 [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm
Questioning the lawyer for Mississippi, Justice Kavanaugh purported to seek reassurance that the state was not asking for the Court to forbid abortion: “you’re arguing that the Constitution’s silent and, therefore, neutral on the question of abortion? [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 4:14 pm
In Barrett v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm
We're In The Section 3 Endgame Now (1/11/24). [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 5:09 am
Code §1349, Barrett Byron Staton filed a motion for return of property under Rule 41(g) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. [read post]
