Search for: "In Re Goldman" Results 101 - 120 of 1,879
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2007, 1:12 pm
" [The Smoking Gun via Huffington Post] TMZ's Coverage of Their Own Allegedly Contumacious Conduct Since we're already directing you to TMZ, we'll forego a direct link to the manuscript itself, lest we be held in contempt as well (shut up; we know what you're thinking.) [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 7:33 am by Glenn Reynolds
It is a central tenet of the federal securities laws that you’re allowed to sell rotten eggs, so long as you disclose that they’re rotten. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 11:47 am by By KEVIN ROOSE
Standard & Poor's said it was re-examining its criteria for evaluating certain types of "conduit" securities. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 8:15 pm by Mandelman
  After that scroll down for lots more from the mind of Goldman’s CEO. [read post]
10 May 2007, 6:51 am
It's good to be Goldman: "In an effort to uphold the rule that the Masters of the Universe can pretty much get away with anything simply because they're the Masters of the Universe (see, also: Jobs, backdating), a federal judge has ruled that Goldman cannot be included in a lawsuit by Fannie Mae shareholders. [read post]
2 May 2007, 11:51 am
To learn more about the kinds of concerns that motivated this decision, check out Eric Goldman's Co-Blogging Law. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 5:45 am by Glenn Reynolds
Given the Dems’ closeness to Goldman, Sachs and GE, they’re not exactly standing up to Big Business. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 2:34 pm
But you're about to lose control of the dialogue. [read post]
19 Feb 2003, 8:24 pm
[JURIST] New and interesting Opinions issued Wednesday included In re: Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation [PDF text], a decision by Judge Shira Scheidlin of US District Court for the Southern District of New York [official website] refusing to throw out an investor lawsuit accusing Citigroup's Salomon Smith Barney, Goldman Sachs Group and 53 other investment banks of rigging hundreds [read post]
" Anyone in solo practice or interested in pursuing this avenue of legal employment should read this article, a portion of which is reproduced below:"Andrea Goldman, Leanna Hamill and Fred Bauerlein are alone, but they’re not unique. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 4:18 pm
It’s quite literally academic — unless you’re [...] [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 2:00 am by Stephanie Figueroa
Sullivan & Cromwell recently released a publication discussing the Delaware Chancery Court’s decision in In re Micromet, Inc. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 2:04 pm by ccollins
The collusion purportedly involved the banks agreeing not to compete against each other for re-marketing services. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 1:11 am by Buce
   But lawyers at least go through the pretense of declaring that they're bound  by principles of client loyalty. [read post]