Search for: "In Re Humphrey"
Results 101 - 120
of 399
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2020, 5:13 pm
The State Supreme Court posted an order on the docket of In re Humphrey (2018) 19 Cal.App.5th 1006, pending as # S247278, making Part III of the Court of Appeal decision in the case legal precedent. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 9:38 am
Although the Supreme Court did not overrule its 1935 decision in Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:42 pm
Res. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 12:26 pm
Until last week, it seemed like Biden would pick an African-American woman as his running mate, with several impressive leaders in the mix. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am
Justice Elena Kagan briefly raised questions about the clarity of this interpretation, but Roberts applied something like res judicata to historical interpretation: “The dissent, for its part, largely reprises points that the Court has already considered and rejected,” such as “downplay[ing] the decision of 1789. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 11:32 pm
"No wonder Humphrey's had "narrowly confined the scope of the Myers decision. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 12:12 pm
Humphrey, which ruled that claims under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
30 May 2020, 8:20 am
We highly recommend re-reading the Hornblower novels in this time of home sheltering. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 6:47 am
That is life: if you write a good law book, you’re not done with one edition but are caught. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 6:24 am
They're about closing down access to abortion. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 3:49 am
Thus, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s order refusing registration of both proposed marks was affirmed (In re JC Hospitality LLC, February 28, 2020, Prost, S.). [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 7:56 am
[Neither Amicus gave the CFPB the defense it needed] Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard argument in Seila Law v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 11:07 am
Justice Neil Gorsuch also seemed uninclined to adopt such an interpretation, asking Clement to explain the difference between “watering” the standard down and “being honest about what we’re doing” by overruling Humphrey’s Executor. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 7:35 am
Examination & Extensions All pending applications which had not been advertised as of June 17, 2019 were to be re-examined under the new Act. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 9:54 am
Smith tells us that Jason Daubert “briefly mulled reopening his case when Diclegis, the updated version of Bendectin, was re-approved. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 6:11 am
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON In re: GYPC, INC., Debtor Case No. 17‐31030 Adv. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 4:12 am
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON In re: TAGNETICS INC., Case No. 19‐30822 Judge Humphrey Chapter 7 Decision Granting Petitioning Creditors’ Motion for Contempt (Doc. 145) and Determining Additional Interest as a Remedy to Enforce Compliance This matter is before the court on the Motion to Hold Tagnetics in Indirect Contempt (doc. 145) (the “Motion”), filed by petitioning creditors… [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 10:07 am
In addition to Ervin and Cranston, influential Democratic senators such as Birch Bayh, Hubert Humphrey, Edward Kennedy, Edmund Muskie and Abraham Ribicoff were active in these reform efforts. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 7:29 am
Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 4:12 am
This Board again confirmed the revocation of the VITA mark, arguing, on a number of points, that the earlier Board decision had been confirmed by the Court and was as such res judicata. [read post]