Search for: "In Re Humphrey" Results 101 - 120 of 399
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2020, 5:13 pm by Uthman Law Office
The State Supreme Court posted an order on the docket of In re Humphrey (2018) 19 Cal.App.5th 1006, pending as # S247278, making Part III of the Court of Appeal decision in the case legal precedent. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 9:38 am by Mindy Harris
Although the Supreme Court did not overrule its 1935 decision in Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 12:26 pm by Ediberto Roman
Until last week, it seemed like Biden would pick an African-American woman as his running mate, with several impressive leaders in the mix. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am by Jed Handelsman Shugerman
Justice Elena Kagan briefly raised questions about the clarity of this interpretation, but Roberts applied something like res judicata to historical interpretation: “The dissent, for its part, largely reprises points that the Court has already considered and rejected,” such as “downplay[ing] the decision of 1789. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 11:32 pm by Josh Blackman
"No wonder Humphrey's had "narrowly confined the scope of the Myers decision. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 12:12 pm by Margo Schlanger
Humphrey, which ruled that claims under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
30 May 2020, 8:20 am
We highly recommend re-reading the Hornblower novels in  this time of home sheltering. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 3:49 am by Linda O'Brien (CCH)
Thus, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s order refusing registration of both proposed marks was affirmed (In re JC Hospitality LLC, February 28, 2020, Prost, S.). [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 7:56 am by Josh Blackman
[Neither Amicus gave the CFPB the defense it needed] Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard argument in Seila Law v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 11:07 am by Amy Howe
Justice Neil Gorsuch also seemed uninclined to adopt such an interpretation, asking Clement to explain the difference between “watering” the standard down and “being honest about what we’re doing” by overruling Humphrey’s Executor. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 7:35 am by Janice Bereskin (Bereskin & Parr LLP)
Examination & Extensions All pending applications which had not been advertised as of June 17, 2019 were to be re-examined under the new Act. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 9:54 am by Schachtman
Smith tells us that Jason Daubert “briefly mulled reopening his case when Diclegis, the updated version of Bendectin, was re-approved. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 6:11 am by Chris Wesner
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON In re: GYPC, INC., Debtor Case No. 17‐31030 Adv. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 4:12 am by Chris Wesner
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON In re: TAGNETICS INC., Case No. 19‐30822 Judge Humphrey Chapter 7 Decision Granting Petitioning Creditors’ Motion for Contempt (Doc. 145) and Determining Additional Interest as a Remedy to Enforce Compliance This matter is before the court on the Motion to Hold Tagnetics in Indirect Contempt (doc. 145) (the “Motion”), filed by petitioning creditors… [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 10:07 am by Quinta Jurecic, Andrew Kent
In addition to Ervin and Cranston, influential Democratic senators such as Birch Bayh, Hubert Humphrey, Edward Kennedy, Edmund Muskie and Abraham Ribicoff were active in these reform efforts. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 4:12 am by Verena von Bomhard
This Board again confirmed the revocation of the VITA mark, arguing, on a number of points, that the earlier Board decision had been confirmed by the Court and was as such res judicata. [read post]