Search for: "In Re Subpoena Duces Tecum"
Results 101 - 112
of 112
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2017, 12:52 pm
This post examines a recent opinion from the U.S. [read post]
15 Jun 2006, 4:45 am
Tihomir Blaskic, Judgement on the Request of the Republic of Croatia for Review of the Decision of Trial Chamber II of 18 July 1997 (Objection to the Issue of Subpoena Duces Tecum), at para. 41).True it is that all these authorities related to criminal proceedings, but the holding was in all cases that the private perpetrators of the relevant crimes could not hide behind the attribution of their acts to the state, and that these acts were accordingly, for the purposes of… [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
As of the date this appeal was filed, the parties had mediated twice unsuccessfully.Eight days after the TRO hearing, Adams served Langford with a subpoena duces tecum to produce documents by July 16, the day before the hearing on the parties' cross-applications for temporary injunctions. [read post]
8 May 2011, 11:58 am
C2003aConsumer law -- Deceptive and unfair trade practices -- Trial court did not err in quashing civil investigative subpoena duces tecum issued by attorney general and served on law firm, seeking production of documents related to different subjects involving the law firm's representation of lending institutions in foreclosure cases -- Alleged conduct of the law firm in the present case does not fall within the rubric of “trade or commerce” as required… [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am
” In re Tyrone Noling, 2011 U.S. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 3:05 pm
In the Amerindo securities fraud case, the search warrant was way overbroad ($25M in securities were at issue in a company that managed $1.2B), and all the records of the company fell within the warrant. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
But if they were to talk to a lawyer they could not give the lawyer an iota of information as to what the case is about, what the basis for the subpoena is, or any other details that would permit a lawyer to make an informed decision as to whether a motion to quash the subpoena could, or could not, be made. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 9:55 am
September 25, 2024In a family offense proceeding, the fact that some of the alleged conduct occurred years earlier is not dispositive, as “the issue is the imminence of the danger and not the age of the threat” However, the frequency and age of the alleged conduct is relevant in assessing whether there is “a pattern of imminent and ongoing danger to the” petitioner In Matter of Boltz v Geraci, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2024 WL 4229688, 2024 N.Y. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
A governmental misconduct exception certainly exists, and is needed, in civil litigation where the motive or intent of a government actor is legitimately put into question, see, Subpoena Duces Tecum Served on the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 145 F.3d 1422, 1424-25 & n.2 (D.C. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm
Some legal terms used in our Minnesota criminal justice system are difficult for people to understand. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm
Some legal terms used in our Minnesota criminal justice system are difficult for people to understand. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
Reading Time: 23 minutes Balancing act.My partners Brandon Essig, Jeff Doss, and I recently shared thoughts concerning public corruption trials. [read post]
