Search for: "In re: Proportionality Review Project"
Results 101 - 116
of 116
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2013, 2:44 am
A: Just like Google, Oracle could request a rehearing and file a petition for writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court.Q: Why has this copyright case been appealed to the Federal Circuit, not the Ninth Circuit, and what standard of appellate review will be applied to the key issues? [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
Pix Credit hereEven though I do not find it plausible that the military operation is being conducted withgenocidal intent, I voted in favour of the measures indicated by the Court. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 3:52 am
That kind of reliance builds the volume of users and facilitates quick and easy re-use of such finished work-product. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
., In re Welding Fume Prods. [read post]
23 May 2021, 8:37 am
More importantly it evidences the mechanisms and instruments that the EU will be inclined to develop in asserting its own operational principles and projecting them in relations with others. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 12:30 pm
But we're actually here because in 2022 the SEC rescinded the requirements. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 5:00 am
They actually were interested in my writing projects, and gave me the sense that they took them and me seriously. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 7:47 pm
The FRaft is designed to provide a vehicle through which the academic and civil society vanguard can effectively push the governments of developed states (at least those whose politics are to their liking) to project their law (under cover of the fig leaf of internationalization) into the rest of the wrld. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:02 am
Principles for repeat infringer policy: Need independent review, either judge or administrator. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 2:55 am
The case of Xanthopoulos v Rakshina [2022] EWFC 30 has hit the headlines because of the eye watering legal costs, and the excoriating judicial criticism of the parties for running them up. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
To view these cases distributed by Findlaw.com you must first sign in to Findlaw.com. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 5:27 pm
Could the code benefit from a 1986-style revamping to remove the bolt-ons and re-integrate the system? [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 6:41 pm
(Pix Credit: No Attention Paid on Human Rights When Implementing Economic Reforms! [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 11:08 am
I’m continuing my coverage of dangerous Internet bills in the California legislature. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 3:14 pm
It has been suggested to me that CAFCASS Family Court Workers would not have been permitted to participate in this project without undergoing an internal ethics process. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:55 pm
The nature, extent and potential adverse impacts of these risks call for a proportionate response. [read post]
