Search for: "Kennedy v. James" Results 101 - 120 of 644
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2007, 2:37 pm
The only opinions left are James v US (defining a "violent felony" under federal law), Environmental Defense v Duke Energy (a Clean Air Act case about proper venue and the definition of... z z z z....), and the twin powerhouse of Gonzales v Carhart and Gonzales v Planned Parenthood (the constitutionality of the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act).So who has PBA? [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:36 am
And that anyone is probably named Anthony Kennedy. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:36 am
And that anyone is probably named Anthony Kennedy. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:36 am by James Coppess
James Coppess is the associate general counsel for the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, which filed an amicus brief in support of the union in Janus v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:46 am by Nabiha Syed
Monday’s coverage of the Court continues to focus on Perry v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 10:41 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) The Supreme Court handed down Michigan v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 12:30 am
 In a line of cases going back to 1977's Abood v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:10 pm by George Ticoras
According to the SCOTUSblog, Justice Kennedy has called for a response from the state of Montana by 5 p.m. on Wednesday, February 15. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 10:00 am by Eliot Kim
On April 17, the Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision in Sessions v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 8:56 am by Walter Olson
Here is one possible source of relevance, per James Taranto’s discussion: “Kennedy, unlike Scalia and Thomas, endorsed [in an earlier university racial preference case] the premise that those benefits [specifically, educational benefits obtainable from greater diversity] constitute a “compelling interest” that would justify preferences if the other components of the strict-scrutiny test can be met. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:04 am
" In addition, the Court also announced its ruling in James v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:20 am by Matt Sundquist
Court-watchers are still analyzing and tracking reactions to last week's decision in Citizens United v. [read post]