Search for: "Lackey v. Lackey" Results 101 - 120 of 137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm by John Elwood
Texas, 14-292, in presenting a so-called Lackey claim that long delay in imposing the death penalty during the pendency of appeals and collateral challenges violates the Eighth Amendment. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by John Elwood
We depart from our usual practice of hermetically sealing new and old relists to note that Bowers’ Lackey claim got some new company this week: the newly relisted Davis v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 7:03 am
  EIGHTH UPDATE: This Clarion Ledger story says the judge in the Jones v. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 10:06 am by Sandy Levinson
ADDITION:  One new point:  We would not be having the conversations we are about the degree to which the Attorney General is merely a lackey and lickspittle of the President were we living in the system found in roughly 45 of our states, where the Attorney General is not an appointee of the governor. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:05 am by James Grimmelmann, guest-blogging
On the downside: terrible network latency.Crypto Anarchy: Sean Hastings and Ryan Lackey came out of a tradition that prized better living through cryptography. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 4:48 am by cdw
” Other decisions of note in this edition include a pair of remands in Alabama from the Court of Criminal Appeals, Andrew Reid Lackey v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am by John Elwood
  If they keep this up until a successor to Justice Scalia is seated, Friedrichs’s counsel may have a Lackey claim of his own. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:08 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Code § 5412, was not presented at trial can be found in the Noteworthy Panel Decision (NPD) of Raymond Craig Penrose v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:42 am by John Elwood
Lynaugh and Penry v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 9:44 am by Benjamin Wittes
— Anne-Marie Slaughter (@SlaughterAM) October 17, 2015 Putin v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am by John Elwood
It’s an interesting issue, forever to be called a Lackey claim because of an early petitioner to raise the argument. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 9:51 am
THE COURT : So you agree - - are you telling me that you did join the conspiracy, and you did furnish some money to give to Judge Lackey in return for him issuing an order in your favor in this case? [read post]