Search for: "Little v. Williams" Results 101 - 120 of 2,724
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm by Mark Walsh
Kirtz, while Justice Sonia Sotomayor goes on a little longer on Murray v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
The Commission devoted significant resources to evaluating its enforcement program in 1972.[9]  In January 1972, Chairman William Casey created a three-member committee to “examine the SEC’s enforcement policy and practices, engage in frequent dialogue with the members of the Commission and with our staff, seek and sift the suggestions of the bar and make recommendations to the Commission for worthwhile improvements to our time-honored ways. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”He argued that Batson has done “little to stop discrimination in the use of preemptory strikes. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:58 pm by Amy Howe
ShareIt has been nearly 40 years since the Supreme Court indicated in Chevron v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:31 pm
But would someone in Congress please file a bill to amend the statute so it doesn't apply to stupid jet skis; or, for that matter, any other tiny little vessel. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
Ex Parte Young.Judge Nelson's opinion expressly concedes that "Wolfe v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
That was Secretary of War William Belknap in 1876. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:47 am by Dan Bressler
Swatting away the claimant’s reliance on Wilson v Great American Industries [1988], he opined that Zappia ‘read[s] too much into too little.'” “Moreover, the judge held that even if Skadden had a conflict of interest, it would not have been material to a reasonable investor, because the information about the firm’s representation of other Sumitomo Group entities was publicly available and did not significantly alter the total mix of information in… [read post]