Search for: "Low v. Austin" Results 101 - 120 of 269
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2010, 7:01 am by Chip Merlin
Even assuming the methodology is sound, the data is wrong and the calculation is far too low. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 1:06 pm
  The compensation amount under Section 1.61 21(f)(5)(iii) remains unchanged at $215,000.The Code provides that the $1,000,000,000 threshold used to determine whether a multiemployer plan is a systematically important plan under section 432(e)(9)(H)(v)(III)(aa) is adjusted using the cost-of-living adjustment provided under Section 432(e)(9)(H)(v)(III)(bb). [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:24 am by Schachtman
Mass. 1997)(occupational epidemiology of benzene exposure and benzene does not inform health effects from vanishingly low exposure to benzene in bottled water) Whiting v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:54 am by Jonathan H. Adler
In his book, Tatel wrote that Ginsburg told him about the behind-the-scenes dealings in a 2009 case, known as Northwest Austin v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 7:30 am by Matt Sundquist
The Court recently granted the NRA’s request to participate in the oral argument in McDonald v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:22 am by Schachtman
Austin Bradford Hill, “The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation? [read post]