Search for: "Marshall v. District of Columbia"
Results 101 - 120
of 241
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2016, 11:43 am
Vimeo (the 2013 district court ruling) and Columbia v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:00 am
Paul Marshall, Bridge Securities, LLC a/k/a/ Bridge Financial, Bridge Equity, Inc., and FOGfuels, Inc.Case number: 13-cv-3032 (United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia)Case filed: September 11, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: September 16, 2014 10/23/2014 01/21/2015 2014-102 SEC v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 10:15 am
The panel also rejected the district court’s conclusion that the District of Columbia’s legislation extending the statute of limitations for appellant’s claims violated the separation of powers by altering a final judgment, and for the same basic reason: the District of Columbia did not “revive finally adjudicated claims” by amending the limitations period because the complaint had been dismissed without… [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 1:34 pm
The second case today, Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Marshall saw it as a broad and sweeping power granted to chief executives so they could act mercifully.That case, United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 8:40 am
District Court for the District of Columbia under 35 USC § 145. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 10:35 am
Among the most important briefs is the brief filed by the Virginiaattorney general and the attorneys general of twenty-one other states and the District of Columbia. [read post]
12 May 2011, 1:23 pm
“We had in the 1990s addicts dying in the streets, hundreds, some years more than one a day,” Craig Jones, lawyer for the government of British Columbia, told the Supreme Court of Canada. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Ever since the Court’s watershed decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 11:21 am
Atkins and Scott v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 7:39 am
Also at NPR, Larry Abramson describes the complaints that, notwithstanding the Court’s decision two years ago in District of Columbia v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 2:30 am
District of Columbia, a rather arcane case the court decided on Monday. [read post]
15 May 2008, 3:28 am
However, Chief Justice Marshall famously said in McCulloch v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:56 am
(Later he became a federal district judge.) [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 8:46 am
Scalia’s willingness to overturn gun laws in District of Columbia v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 11:27 am
Marshall (counterclaim brought by an estate against a creditor). [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:45 am
As the District Court for the District of Columbia put it while granting summary judgment to the government in American Forest Research Council v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Soon after he authored the lead opinion in Roe v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 1:18 pm
If one wants to get rid of the individual right to bear arms, one should work to repeal the Second Amendment rather than hoping that the Supreme Court will overturn its decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 11:44 am
District of Columbia, the Court’s 2008 Second Amendment “right to bear arms” decision, noted that short-barreled shotguns are “not typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes. [read post]
