Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 101 - 120
of 14,342
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2014, 12:27 pm
To make matters even more interesting, the litigation is somewhat a family affair.Harry Winston Inc. was founded by Mr. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 10:09 am
Where sufficient control is not exercised through such licensing regimes, trade marks may be vulnerable to non-use action The post Don’t be a Turkey! [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 10:09 am
Where sufficient control is not exercised through such licensing regimes, trade marks may be vulnerable to non-use action The post Don’t be a Turkey! [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
This would appear to be a strange result (and goes against eg Case T-152/07 Lange Uren v OHIM). [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 3:05 am
The AP discussed the rejection of the proposed Obama bin Laden trademark: "The examining attorney refuses registration because the mark consists of or comprises matter which may falsely suggest a connection with the individuals Osama bin Laden and Barack Obama," Karen Bush wrote in a Feb. 6 application response.Batlle, who paid $325 for the application, continues to sell T-shirts and mugs with the name "Obama bin Laden" on his Web site. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 9:07 am
Even assuming that the other one was, there was no evidence that being marked with two patent numbers mattered given that one was truthful. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 11:00 am
[Afro Leo wonders: To start with, isn't Nollywood now in the dictionary? [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 8:35 am
In Antitrust Matters, we bring you perspectives of experts and visionaries in the field who discuss where antitrust law has been, where it is going, and why it matters today more than ever before. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 9:12 am
(He also thinks that confusion over authorization shouldn’t generally matter; see his & Lemley and my work on materiality.) [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 10:15 pm
Size apparently doesn't matter in Arizona. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 5:15 am
Isn't the understanding of the consuming public the paramount issue?] [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 4:13 pm
Although there are goods and services where the mark, on its own, or with other matter, may be regarded as being distinctive, a cautious approach is required. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 3:57 am
As such, the Galápagos would likely be at the bottom of any list of locales that would be expected to give rise to a trade mark matter. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 5:31 am
Indeed, it's unproven whether fingerprints are unique, but pretty clear that some partial prints - which is what examiners are usually matching - may not be unique enough to differentiate.If and when scientists prove ballistics markings aren't unique - or for that matter, partial fingerprints - will the court still be as bold? [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 4:36 am
[T]he marks are similar, with Defendant’s mark appropriating the entirety of Plaintiff's mark and adding the descriptive, disclaimed term VEGAN to distinguish them. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 11:11 am
Moreover, if the shared element of the two marks is “weak” in that it is generic, descriptive, or highly suggestive of the goods or services identified in the application or registration, then other matter in the marks may be sufficient to obviate confusion. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 7:07 am
This matters 1) where the trade mark owner also owns a Community design, and 2) where the trade mark owner is the sole manufacturer of the original part. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 12:49 pm
Spyros Maniatis ((Queen Mary) then gave a blow-by-blow account of the CJEU ruling on bad faith in Case C-529/07 Lindt. and the General Court decision in Case T-136/11 Pelikan, which dealt with the making of repeat applications for almost-the-same marks. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 3:22 pm
Map of Rock Island Commentary: Tires popping on the road is a very serious matter, and this driver is lucky that he wasn’t too badly injured. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 9:35 pm
Case T‑395/14 Best-Lock (Europe) Ltd v OHIM, Lego Juris A/S is another of those intellectual property cases that hits the headlines on account of its subject matter rather than because of its intrinsic legal interest -- though it is by no means lacking in legal interest. [read post]
