Search for: "Matter of Spencer v Spencer"
Results 101 - 120
of 487
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2012, 7:34 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch) (IPKat post here), the English Court of Appeal examined in detail the nature and role of survey evidence. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 2:39 pm
Forensic Justice Project v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 9:15 pm
Burlage v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 10:13 am
Spencer, 319 N.J. [read post]
26 May 2008, 2:58 pm
In the realm of obviousness (and KSR v. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 7:10 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:34 am
Spencer So we were all very relieved when in a case in 2010 called Elias v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 7:05 am
These measures were the focus of a wide-ranging Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Charter) attack by several applicants in the Federal Court case of Spencer v Canada (Health), 2021 FC 621 (CanLII). [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch). [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 11:31 am
J.L.R. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 6:38 am
Spencer, 124 F.3d 92 (2d Cir. 1997), and Faghri's case ties this doctrine together in a fairly bright-line way. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 11:14 am
’” Spencer v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 8:35 am
D.H. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 2:32 pm
Those differences proved fatal to the plaintiff’s disparate impact claims in the case of Spencer v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 7:40 am
A recent case emanating from Kings County Surrogate’s Court, Matter of Kramer, N.Y.L.J. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:29 am
No matter whether the purchaser is foreign or domestic, no matter where the transaction occurred. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
Spencer, 2014 SCC 43 Four issues, answered as follows: (1) Police obtaining subscriber information matching the IP address from the ISP constitute a search? [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 1:01 am
” Spencer Roane The losing party then appealed that ruling, and the case was once again before the Supreme Court, this time under the name Martin v. [read post]
24 Nov 2017, 8:37 am
Despite a period of uncertainty, the Supreme Court clarified the law in Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Limited [2015] UKSC 72, confirming that the traditional strict tests still represent the law. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 12:12 pm
Spencer's stated strategic priority regardless of the fact that the recent launch of CoD Modern Warfare II has been wildly successful. [read post]
