Search for: "Medellin v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 217
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2007, 8:30 am
In an amicus filing in the case of Medellin v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 4:26 pm by Lyle Denniston
   All of the filings are titled Leal Garcia v. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 6:07 am by Kent Scheidegger
  At no time was the United States Government or any federal official a party to any action.The particular proceeding that came to the Supreme Court as Medellin v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 5:02 am by B.W. Barnett
Supreme Court has held that the Vienna Convention does not control Texas or national law (Medellin v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 8:57 pm
The foreign affairs illustration of this "negative" empowerment technique is the Supreme Court's 2008 decision in Medellin v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 9:56 am
" But it's hard to argue that there isn't value in putting another one more check on the president's ability to act unilaterally in areas where Congress should have a role.Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 9:00 pm
 Yesterday saw five of the most conservative of the Supreme Court justices refusing to require a state court system (in Texas) to let an International Court of Justice ruling cause Texas to deviate from its law that does not permit more than one state-level habeas corpus proceeding. blank">Medellin v. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 4:00 am
On Tuesday, the state of Texas is scheduled to execute Jose Ernesto Medellin, the petitioner in Medellin v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 4:16 pm
The Vienna treaty, by contrast, was deemed by the Supreme Court in Medellin v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 9:28 pm
The Vienna treaty, by contrast, was deemed by the Supreme Court in Medellin v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:23 am by zshapiro
It accepted the arguments of the State of Texas that Medellin is the law of the land and that it precluded any stay. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 10:29 am
On Wednesday, the Court will hear oral argument in Medellin v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 9:28 am by Roger Alford
The Senate hearing on the treaty made clear that the purpose of this language was to respond to Medellin. “Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Medellin v. [read post]