Search for: "Michael McConnell"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,142
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2023, 9:30 pm
In The President Who Would Not Be King: Executive Power under the Constitution, Professor Michael McConnell takes Crosskey’s observation as a starting point of his own more systematic analysis of how the Committee of Detail divided these prerogative powers between Congress and the President. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 8:55 am
In The President Who Would Not Be King: Executive Power under the Constitution, Professor Michael McConnell takes Crosskey’s observation as a starting point of his own more systematic analysis of how the Committee of Detail divided these prerogative powers between Congress and the President. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 4:30 am
Here is the abstract: In March, 2022, Professor Michael McConnell and I debated the original design of the Constitution at The Federalist Society’s annual National Student Symposium. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 9:30 pm
John Mikhail, Georgetown University Law Center, has posted The Original Federalist Theory of Implied Powers, which is forthcoming in the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy:William Lloyd Garrison (NYPL)In March, 2022, Professor Michael McConnell and I debated the original design of the Constitution at The Federalist Society’s annual National Student Symposium. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Michael McConnell (Stanford) on the Congress and Presidential Election appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 6:17 pm
Michael W. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 8:28 am
Michael McConnell (Stanford) on <i>303 Creative</i> (the Web Site Designer / Same-Sex Wedding Case) appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 10:32 am
To illustrate this futility, I will focus on an amicus brief (in support of the Court hearing the case) written by a number of all-star first amendment and originalist scholars including Michael McConnell, Richard Epstein, Mark Scarberry, Larry Alexander, Robert George, Steven Smith, and numerous other constitutional law heavyweights. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Losing the Opportunity to Chill Political and Ideological Participation and Organization by the Other Side [* * *] [1] Michael McConnell has noted this before. [2] See, e.g., Robby Soave, 'Grow Up': Yale Law School Students Interrupt Event, Demand Right to Talk over Speakers, Reason, Mar. 16, 2022, 5:30 pm, https://perma.cc/ZN4V-2CM8; Samantha Harris, "Stop Debating": CUNY Law Students Disrupt Speaker and His Critic, FIRE, Apr. 12, 2018,… [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
Then Mitch McConnell and Donald Trump happened, and it was gone. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
For example, Professor Michael McConnell wrote about this in a 1987 article called Why Hold Elections? [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 3:00 am
Mitch McConnell was reelected as Republican leader, quashing a challenge from Sen. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
by Michael C. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
That, even though a state senate sponsored investigation by Trump hard-liner Michael Gableman yielded no evidence of any noteworthy ballot fraud.Sensible Midwest voters in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania protected their courts by sending Mastriano, Michels, and Dixon to defeat.2. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 7:31 am
The Republican lawmaker expected to chair the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Michael McCaul of Texas, supports Ukraine, but also says he will lead the effort for “more oversight and accountability in terms of the funding and where the money is going. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 5:03 am
by Michael C. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 5:30 am
The Capitol riot was denounced by most Americans; Republican leaders like Vice President Pence and Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) carried out their constitutional duties. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 8:46 am
Dick Durbin, Michael Gerhardt, Gene Healy, Brian Kalt, Michael McConnell, Victoria Nourse, and me. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization symposium on James E. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
But the originalist scholarship is in near unanimous agreement that, as Nathan Chapman and Michael McConnell have shown, due process of law was indeed procedural: so long as rules of conduct are established by the competent authorities (legislatures) and do not otherwise violate a specific constitutional provision, and any violations of those rules are adjudicated in courts at least according to the processes established by law, there is no violation of the clause. [read post]
