Search for: "Michigan v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 3,592
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2012, 2:15 pm
In a decision by the Michigan Court of Appeals made on December 20th, Darryl Willard Cain, the defendant-appellant, had his argument that convictions for carjacking and unlawfully driving away in a motor vehicle violated both the Michigan and United States Constitutions rejected. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:33 pm by Madelaine Lane
On July 14, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court published Chief Justice Kelly’s majority opinion in Adair v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 8:56 am by Gene Takagi
On January 21, 2009, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 1:16 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 1:11 am
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, better known as [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:55 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
How fitting for Michigan to take this major first step in aligning its practices with the requirements of the United States Constitution during this 50th anniversary year of the Gideon v Wainwright decision, which guaranteed counsel to indigent defendants facing prison time. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:21 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
” Mich United Conservation Clubs v Anthony, 90 Mich App 99, 109; 280 NW2d 883 (1979) (citations omitted). [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:17 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
District Court Judge Bernard Friedman issued an opinion and order declaring Michigan's state constitutional ban to be a violation of the Equal Protection clause of the United States Constitution.In conjunction with Governor Snyder, Michigan's Attorney General has aggressively pursued the state's appellate options in the DeBoer same-sex marriage and adoption case. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 7:49 am by Eugene Volokh
The United States Supreme Court recently elucidated the structure of the required analysis in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc v Bruen (2022). [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
Enbridge has countered Michigan’s demand with an action for declaratory and injunctive relief before the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan Southern Division (Federal Court), arguing that the state lacks the authority to terminate the Line 5 easement as the matter falls under federal jurisdiction under the Pipeline Safety Act. [read post]