Search for: "Miller v. Harder" Results 101 - 120 of 137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In such cases, the Supreme Court has made clear in Washington v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am by Marty Lederman
Not surprisingly, there are already a slew of reactions to the Court's landmark decision on Friday in Carpenter v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 11:09 pm
Look at a case from Australia called Lockwood Security Products Pty Ltd v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Tucker Carlson Just Inadvertently Helped Raise $14,000 for Abortion Rights MSN – Steven Zeitchik (Washington Post) | Published: 6/27/2022 Hours after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear four years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:56 am by INFORRM
One way to proceed would be to make it (marginally) harder to obtain an injunction by emulating the threshold test that prevails in libel cases. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am by Stephen E. Sachs
(It also depends on whether legislatures can rescind their ratifications, as some may have done; for more on that, see Michael Stokes Paulsen's General Theory of Article V.) [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 4:30 am
Miller's gut feeling is that false positives are worse (in patent) than false negatives. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
But at the end of the day, Ranked-Choice Voting for a single office like a governorship would generally make it harder for a fringe candidate to win with a simple plurality in a three-way race.Also, Ranked-Choice Voting requires a more complicated ballot, allowing second and third choices, etc., to be formally tabulated. [read post]