Search for: "Miller v. Harder" Results 101 - 120 of 127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Tucker Carlson Just Inadvertently Helped Raise $14,000 for Abortion Rights MSN – Steven Zeitchik (Washington Post) | Published: 6/27/2022 Hours after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:56 am by INFORRM
One way to proceed would be to make it (marginally) harder to obtain an injunction by emulating the threshold test that prevails in libel cases. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear four years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am by Stephen E. Sachs
(It also depends on whether legislatures can rescind their ratifications, as some may have done; for more on that, see Michael Stokes Paulsen's General Theory of Article V.) [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 4:30 am
Miller's gut feeling is that false positives are worse (in patent) than false negatives. [read post]
10 May 2010, 6:05 am by SOIssues
MILLER Their youthful faces stare from the pages of Delaware’s online sex offender registry, some obviously scared, some scowling, some expressionless. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
But at the end of the day, Ranked-Choice Voting for a single office like a governorship would generally make it harder for a fringe candidate to win with a simple plurality in a three-way race.Also, Ranked-Choice Voting requires a more complicated ballot, allowing second and third choices, etc., to be formally tabulated. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Under the provisional lines Draper proposes, of the 12 Senators who would come from the six Californias, we could expect four (from Silicon Valley and West California) to consistently be Democrats, and four (from Jefferson and Central California) to lean Republican, with the other four (from Northern California and South California) harder to predict. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Michelle
Until then, it is demoing the wallet, as Miller did Monday at Money20/20 in Las Vegas. . . . [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 6:00 am by CMS
But I suppose if you are judging by what has brought the court most into the public eye since its inception, then the most significant decisions have got to be the two Miller cases. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm by Jacob Fishman
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Miller, Patel, and McCarthy have been viewed as crucial witnesses for understanding government’s response to the assault and former President Trump’s reaction to the breach. [read post]