Search for: "Milton v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 357
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2015, 5:29 am
More recently, the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR in Zakharov v Russia stated that “the interception authorisation, … must clearly identify a specific person …or single set of premises”. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 6:32 am
Additional Resources: 2 Dead After Truck Crashes Into Charles River, November 7, 2015, CBS Boston, by Jim Smith More Blog Entries: Floyd-Tunnell v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 4:02 am
On Monday 12 October the Privy Council will hand down judgment in Pinard-Byrne v Lennox Linton (Dominica) and Milton & Anor v The Queen (British Virgin Islands). [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 10:00 am
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant Attorney General Philip V. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 9:23 am
During his time as a teacher he has also argued a number of major cases in state and federal courts, most notably Daubert v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 1:04 am
Mandalia v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7 May 2015. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 10:04 am
Press release In today’s Grand Chamber judgment in the case of Delfi AS v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 4:37 am
Supreme Court agreed to decide this past Monday in the case of Green v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 7:08 am
She said, “The trial was called the United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 11:05 am
In Velasquez v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:08 pm
The correct test for demonstrating prima facie discrimination per Moore v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 9:14 am
In giving the only judgment Lady Hale stated that no enquiries were made to assess the practicability of moving the family to Bletchley or as to the children’s needs, subject to the Children’s Act 2004, s 11(2). [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 10:32 am
The first standard applied, the Cronic standard (from the SCOTUS ruling in United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:02 am
Dancing with the Stars In Rogers v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 12:00 am
It originates from the rights of privacy afforded under the United States Constitution, but surprisingly, there is no federal right per se. [3] [4] Rather, forty states recognize either a statutory or common law right of publicity, and fourteen extend its reach beyond a person’s death. [5] As a result, California’s right of publicity laws are different from New York, etc., which means that a lawsuit’s outcome is highly dependent on the state law… [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 7:31 pm
Justice Dickson stated in R. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 12:52 pm
In Sheppard v. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 9:07 am
State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 11:56 am
Milton Dadeland, LLC v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 7:41 am
WCC accepted the full housing duty towards Ms N and offered a five bedroom house as temporary accommodation in Bletchley, near Milton Keynes (approximately 50 miles away from Westminster). [read post]
