Search for: "Missouri Public Service Company v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2011, 2:20 am by Kelly
Advising inventors, their spouses, and their start-up companies: James Joyce v Armstrong Teasdale (Patently-O) District Court N D California: Use of patent reexamination evidence in parallel litigation: Volterra Semiconductor Corporation v Primarion Inc (Patents Post-Grant) District Court E D California: Government’s approval of false marking settlement precludes later challenge that settlement was “staged” and therefore lacks preclusive effect: Champion… [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm by John Elwood
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 17-71, and Markle Interests, LLC. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by John Elwood
United States, 14-419, before it), Umaña v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
(TTABlog) Monarch Casino & Resort - Trademark battle over the fame of ATLANTIS for casino services headed to trial in Nevada District Court: Kerzner International Inc v Monarch Casino & Resort Inc (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) Soccer United Marketing – SUM and Major League Soccer sue of Black & Decker over ‘ambush marketing’ (Trademark Blog)   [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am by INFORRM
United States The trial to determine the damages owed to E Jean Carroll by Donald Trump began on 16 January 2024 in New York. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:33 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
Congress has reportedly authorized $550 million in the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) ReConnect funding in 2019 (as compared to $600 million in 2018). [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
Here is a free legal opinion thanks to the Student Press Law Center: New York Times Company v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Car rentals also afford travelers flexibility that public transit or taxicabs may not provide. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
– EIPR article (PatLit)   United States US Patent Reform Dr. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
United States, where the court is being asked to rule on the permissibility of the police using phone records without a warrant. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:01 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
Because the NBAM includes public and proprietary data, coverage details are available only to state and federal “partners” and not the general public. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
Petitioner Shawn Wass seeks clarification of Missouri v. [read post]