Search for: "NICKELL v. STATE" Results 101 - 120 of 159
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2022, 6:01 pm by Thomas James
By contrast, if you present a check for $4 million dollars to a rare coin vendor to purchase a 1913 Liberty V nickel, you would not consider it acceptable for the vendor to give you a standard-issue 2019 nickel in its place. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 11:30 pm by Dáire McCormack-George
Such a definition, be it heuristic or conceptual, has been accepted by at least some philosophers (see James Nickel, ‘Is there a Human Right to Employment? [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 10:31 am by Soroush Seifi
”[14] After certification, the union is the one and only party that can bargain for all employees, including those who did not vote for the certification of the union.[15]  The extent of this bargaining power is noteworthy: in Falconbridge, the union was assumed to have the power to effectively waive the ESA on behalf of its employees regardless of the individual employees knowledge or consent to such a concession with potential adverse effect on the employees.[16]  It is… [read post]
23 May 2016, 10:13 am by John Chierichella and Keith Szeliga
Volume V—The Land Mines Strewn Throughout the Data Room M&A transactions, like most transactions in life, involve a cost/benefit analysis. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 9:05 pm by Zoe Stern
A state judge overturned Georgia’s ban on abortion after six weeks of pregnancy, ruling that it violated Roe v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 3:06 am
The Thomson Corporation filed 01/24/07   closed 03/09/07 1:07-cv-00527 Nickels and Dimes Incorporated et al v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
 And the Supreme Court has a pending Second Amendment case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
  Although the motion judge refused to strike the claim, the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and stated that the proper defendant in the case was the manufacturer. [read post]