Search for: "Neil Siegel" Results 101 - 120 of 207
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2014, 9:47 am
Participants include Susannah Pollvogt (Washburn), Neil Siegel (Duke), William Araiza (Brooklyn), Russell Robinson (Berkeley), Justin Marceau (Denver), and me. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 12:30 pm by Jessie Hill
Martinez, as well as essays by Rick Pildes on PCAOB, Neil Siegel on McDonald v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:30 am by James Romoser
Siegel, Slate) Dobbs, Roe and the Myth of ‘Bodily Autonomy’ (Tish Harrison Warren, The New York Times) Ruling overturning Roe v. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 1:23 pm
Professor Neil Siegel has this article in the Duke Law Journal about the two school integration cases that will be argued on Monday. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 4:36 pm
- Boston attorney Kevin Whitaker on his blog, Privacy & Policy The Heritage Foundation Deliberately Misleads (or in the Alternative is Embarrassingly Wrong) on Estate Tax Repeal - Florida estate planning attorney David Shulman on his South Florida Estate Planning Law blog How to Shop for Safe Toys During the Holidays - Atlanta lawyer Lisa Siegel of Katz, Stepp & Miller on their Georgia Injury Law Blog Couple Seeks Custody of Indian Child Despite Federal Law - Texas attorney Michelle… [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 7:07 am by Jonathan H. Adler
This bit about the newest justices caught my eye: Siegel noted that President Gerald Ford had said he had looked for the best legal mind in the country before selecting Stevens in 1975. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 6:40 am by Amanda Frost
”  Michael Dorf and Neil Siegel have posted an essay on SSRN, available here, arguing that the TAIA only bars suits that have the “immediate purpose” of restraining the collection of taxes. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 8:05 am by JB
The Internet and digital media, which blend traditional legal experts, journalists, commentators, and the general public, have, if anything, enhanced these features of American constitutional culture.The all-star cast of participants includes: Bruce Ackerman (Yale), Akhil Amar (Yale), Jack Balkin (Yale), Emily Bazelon (Yale, Slate), Joan Biskupic (Reuters News), Sujit Choudhry (NYU), Justin Driver (Texas, New Republic), Garrett Epps (University of Baltimore, American Prospect), Barry Friedman (NYU),… [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Thomas Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2014, Forthcoming).Vivian Grosswald Curran, Reviving Human Rights Legislation After Kiobel, (American Journal of International Law, Vol. 107, p. 858, 2013).Neil Siegel, Federalism as a Way Station: Windsor as Exemplar of Doctrine in Motion, (February 14, 2014). [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 7:48 am by Jonathan R. Siegel
Siegel is Professor of Law at George Washington University Law School. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 6:07 am by Jim Sedor
” by Neil Thomas for Texas Tribune Elections Maine: “Maine Regularly Sells Voter Data It Denied to Feds” by Scott Thistle for Governing [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:58 pm by JB
Marty Lederman has offered a splendid analysis of the individual mandate issues here, and, of course, readers of this blog know that Andy Koppelman, Neil Siegel, and I have gone over the doctrinal arguments many times before.So for a change of pace, I point out that, if we use regime theory in political science, the most likely prediction is that a majority of the Justices will defend the basic commitments of the current constitutional regime, which is the New Deal/civil rights… [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 9:19 am
I understand Neil Siegel to be making largely a mode 1 argument. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 8:36 am by Kiera Flynn
  Speakers will include Matthew Adler, Jack Balkin, Stuart Benjamin, James Boyle, Erwin Chemerinsky, Robert Cooter, Mark Hall, Gillian Metzger, Abigail Moncrieff, Arti Rai, Barak Richman, Theodore Ruger, Stephen Sachs, Neil Siegel, Ilya Somin, Guy-Uriel Charles and Ernest Young. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 1:03 pm by Steve Gottlieb
And in an article on an on-line forum, Neil Siegel wrote “The consequentialist concern that traditionalists will be branded as bigots is sufficiently serious for Justice Alito that it counts as a reason for the Court to reject” constitutional claims. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Or BassokIn a recent post, Neil Siegel describes a “major concern expressed during the partisan gerrymandering litigation before the Supreme Court over the past two terms”— “that the Court’s public legitimacy may suffer if it holds that federal courts may adjudicate the merits of political gerrymandering claims. [read post]