Search for: "New York Times Co. v. Sullivan" Results 101 - 120 of 433
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2007, 6:38 pm
A story in the sports section of yesterday's NY Times quoted yours truly as stating that the New York Yankees, as a private organization, act lawfully when they use chains to block the main aisles in the lower portion of the stadium to produce a proper sense of decorum during the playing of the national anthem and (during the seventh inning stretch) God Bless America. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 7:20 pm by Orin Kerr
Finally, he litigated and won New York Times v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:45 am by Laurence H. Tribe
There is little doubt that Dominion’s suit for damages met and indeed exceeded the standard the Supreme Court established in 1964 in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 7:45 am
Because this unjustifiably grants true threats preferential treatment, I respectfully dissent....From the dissenting opinion by Justice Thomas:I write separately to address the majority’s surprising and misplaced reliance on New York Times Co. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Accordingly, said the court, this case was governed by the rule of New York Times Co. v Sullivan, 376 US 254, in which the Supreme Court of the United States interpreted the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as embodying "the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public… [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Additional coverage comes from Adam Liptak at The New York Times. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:45 am by John Steele
From Vorhees New Jersey Legal Malpractice Blog: In Sullivan v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 11:17 pm
For more information see: New York Times Co. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
Since the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in New York Times v Sullivan in 1964, it has been extremely difficult for plaintiffs with any public profile to sue for defamation in the United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 5:45 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Wrote a unanimous panel of the Appellate Division, First Department court in reinstating Chontay Kirby’s first and only cause of action for discrimination in her 11-page complaint, “Although plaintiff’s first cause of action is labeled as one for ‘hostile workplace,’” the lower court “was not bound by that designation and plaintiff has sufficiently stated a cause of action for employment discrimination under both the New York State… [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 9:01 am
In the landmark case of New York Times Co. v Sullivan, the Supreme Court established the rule that a public official must prove "actual malice" to prevail in a defamation action based on a statement relating to his or her official conduct. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 5:32 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Under the same logic, they'd have to suspend any account that posted the Pentagon Papers, which is protected by New York Times Co. v. [read post]