Search for: "Nicholas Bagley" Results 101 - 120 of 144
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2014, 7:10 pm
 As Nicholas Bagley notes: Scientists can demonstrate that the challenged forms of birth control almost never prevent implantation of a fertilized egg. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 1:55 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Nicholas Bagley is “flummoxed” by Bates’s decision in this regard, and I share his confusion. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 10:25 pm by Alana Bevan
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a forthcoming paper for the Michigan Law Review, Nicholas Bagley of the University of Michigan Law School urged administrative lawyers to question the assumption that strict procedural rules are essential to ensure governmental legitimacy and prevent agency capture. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 7:17 am
Other contributors, thus far, include Nicholas Bagley and Abbe Gluck, two of the more thoughtful folks on other side of this case. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 4:11 am by SHG
  In an homage to canons of interpretation, Michigan lawprof Nicholas Bagley made an impassioned plea in the New York Times for the Supreme Court to ignore the words of the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 5:07 am
Professor Nicholas Bagley argues the district court has improperly intervened into a dispute over statutory meaning between the House and the Administration and that the judiciary has no place in the middle of such disputes. [read post]
14 May 2020, 7:15 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
As when the case was before the district court and Fifth Circuit, I have joined with Professors Nicholas Bagley, Abbe Gluck, and co-blogger Ilya Somin to file an amicus brief explaining why, whatever else courts conclude, the individual mandate is severable from what's left of the ACA. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Constitution limits Congress’s ability to delegate legislative authority to administrative agencies—cannot be squared with the founders’ original understanding of the Constitution, according to Julian Davis Mortenson and Nicholas Bagley of the University of Michigan Law School. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:23 am by Amy Howe
  At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley discusses the prospect that the Court could stay its decision in King (and the possible effects of such a stay), while at the National Review Online’s Bench Memos Michael Cannon argues that “the Court will have to lower the bar quite a bit to find the ACA’s Exchange provisions coercive. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:09 am by Amy Howe
  Lyle Denniston covered the grant for this blog; contributors to our “snap symposium” on the grant included Nicholas Bagley, Abbe Gluck, and Jonathan H. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 2:45 am by Amy Howe
  Ronald Mann previewed the case for this blog, while in The New England Journal of Medicine Nicholas Bagley and Christopher Koller argue that the case “threatens to cripple these databases and other state initiatives that aim to improve the health care system. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary comes from Marty Lederman at Balkinization, Jeffrey Toobin in The New Yorker, Nicholas Bagley in The New York Times, Robert Schlesinger at U.S. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 3:14 am by Amy Howe
”  Nicholas Bagley weighs in with a post at The Incidental Economist, observing that to prevail the challengers in the case must “believe that the judges and commentators who read the statute differently than they do . . . are all behaving unreasonably. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 4:00 am by Amy Howe
”  At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley considers the decision and why the ACA “require[s] employers to cover birth control for women in the first place,” and at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog Steven Schwinn and Ruthann Robson discuss a possible response by Congress to the decision. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 5:51 am by Amy Howe
” Briefly: At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley offers “a modest proposal” to “fix” the Court’s recent decision in Gobeille v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am by Amy Howe
  At Balkinization, Marty Lederman and Neil Kinkopf focus on the Take Care Clause issue, while Nicholas Bagley discusses the Administrative Procedure Act issue. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 1:55 am by NCC Staff
University of Michigan law professor Nicholas Bagley believes the case doesn’t have legs. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 6:47 am by Amy Howe
Nicholas Bagley weighs in on the standing issue at The Incidental Economist, expressing “serious doubts about the standing of” three of the four challengers. [read post]