Search for: "Ohio v. Roberts" Results 101 - 120 of 1,008
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2009, 2:26 pm
Blume asserted that Ashe v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 1:25 pm
The University of Pennsylvania Law Review Penumbra currently features an online debate between Professors Bradley Smith (Capital University Law School) and Edward Foley (Moritz College of Law-Ohio State University) on voter identification requirements and Crawford v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 8:20 am by robhealey
The Ohio jury Instruction cites language from State v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 9:25 am by David Post
Roberts did not travel to Ohio; indeed, he has never been to that State. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 8:18 am by Steve Hall
As jurors prepared to decide whether Ohio killer Frank G. [read post]
6 May 2015, 7:52 am by MBettman
This decision is a marvelous irony to me, because Chief Justice Robert’s majority opinion pretty much debunks everything Justice Scalia wrote in Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
At Take Care, Robert Post examines “the status of [the cakeshop’s] freedom of speech claim after the Court’s opinion” in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 8:39 am
Washington (541 U.S. 36 [2004]), overruled its prior holding in Ohio v Roberts ( 41 U.S. 36 [2004]) that reliability of hearsay evidence is the test for admissibility, and held that "Where testimonial evidence is at issue, however, the Sixth Amendment demands what the common law required: unavailability and a prior opportunity for cross-examination…. [read post]
25 May 2007, 8:41 am
The ruling reinstated the case of Ohio death row inmate Robert Van Hook, who was convicted of the 1985 murder of a man he met in a gay bar. [read post]