Search for: "Oregon v. Branch" Results 101 - 120 of 132
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:00 am by Ronald Collins
From my teaching post at the University of Oregon, I had written a book, To An Unknown God: Religious Freedom on Trial (2001), that was a history of one case. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
Oregon’s Attorney General filed a lawsuit against several federal agencies, including the U.S. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 12:14 pm by Bill Raftery
V, § 20 Montana All justices and judges shall be paid as provided by law, but salaries shall not be diminished during terms of office. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 12:14 pm by Bill Raftery
V, § 27 Illinois Judges shall receive salaries provided by law which shall not be diminished to take effect during their terms of office. [read post]
14 May 2021, 3:10 pm by fvanloon
They include several in California, Colorado, Massachusetts, Oregon, New Jersey, Illinois, Oregon, and Vermont. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 8:46 am by Quinta Jurecic
  On February 9, 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit declined to stay or narrow one such order pending the outcome of further judicial proceedings, while noting that the "political branches are far better equipped to make appropriate distinctions" about who should be covered by a suspension of entry or of refugee admissions. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 4:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Arizona Advisory Committee cautioned that, "Unless an event is directly related to the law, the legal system, or the administration of justice, judges should refrain from publicizing their affiliation with the judicial branch when participating. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
” Such an alteration in the respective powers of the judicial and legislative branches, says the court, would profoundly change the “scheme” of government so as to be a revision.Perhaps the seminal California Supreme Court case on the revision/amendment line is Raven v. [read post]