Search for: "PRACTICING LAW INSTITUTE"
Results 101 - 120
of 32,170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2012, 1:10 am
New Treatise on Practice Before the PTAB This coming fall, the Practicing Law Institute (PLI) will publish the treatise entitled: Post Grant Proceedings Before the Patent Trial & Appeal Board. [read post]
27 May 2019, 5:38 am
Family law does not have juries in most states (including the two I practice in, Illinois and Chicago). [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 12:45 am
Kellogg Partners Institutional Servs., NY Slip Op 08983 (1st Dept. 2010) Tomorrow’s issue: Motion practice. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 3:06 am
The Swiss Institute of Comparative Law (Lausanne) is looking for a Postdoctorand in transnational family law (80%). [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 6:26 am
Hopt, a professor and director (emeritus) at the Max-Planck-Institute for Comparative and International Private Law, in Hamburg and was advisor inter alia for the European Commission, the German legislator and the Ministries of Finance and of Justice. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 1:09 pm
The post Entity Selection for Law Practice Startups appeared first on Mass LOMAP. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 3:06 pm
Olia Kanevskaia (Universiteit Utrecht) has published The Law and Practice of Global ICT Standardization (Cambridge Univ. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
Following the close of a public comment period on the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s draft framework on the U.S. government’s exercise of “march-in” rights, partners Julie Goldemberg and Nathan Smith and associate Alyssa Pugh wrote an article for Lexis Practical Guidance . [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
Following the close of a public comment period on the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s draft framework on the U.S. government’s exercise of “march-in” rights, partners Julie Goldemberg and Nathan Smith and associate Alyssa Pugh wrote an article for Lexis Practical Guidance . [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
Following the close of a public comment period on the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s draft framework on the U.S. government’s exercise of “march-in” rights, partners Julie Goldemberg and Nathan Smith and associate Alyssa Pugh wrote an article for Lexis Practical Guidance . [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
Following the close of a public comment period on the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s draft framework on the U.S. government’s exercise of “march-in” rights, partners Julie Goldemberg and Nathan Smith and associate Alyssa Pugh wrote an article for Lexis Practical Guidance . [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
Following the close of a public comment period on the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s draft framework on the U.S. government’s exercise of “march-in” rights, partners Julie Goldemberg and Nathan Smith and associate Alyssa Pugh wrote an article for Lexis Practical Guidance . [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
Following the close of a public comment period on the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s draft framework on the U.S. government’s exercise of “march-in” rights, partners Julie Goldemberg and Nathan Smith and associate Alyssa Pugh wrote an article for Lexis Practical Guidance . [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 10:57 am
And last week, at the Harvard Law School/New York Law School Future of Education Conference, Vielka Holness, Director of the John Jay College of Criminal Justice Pre Law Institute, . . . said that schools need to bridge the gap between legal theory and actual practice. . . . [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:09 am
” Federal law (38 U.S.C. 3696) requires the VA to enter into an agreement with the FTC to help ensure that the VA does not approve the enrollment of an eligible veteran or person in a course offered by an institution that uses any type of unfair or deceptive advertising, marketing or enrollment practices in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 5:56 am
Hopt is former director at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law, Hamburg, Germany. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 10:00 pm
The letter states that the Department will enforce its new directive 14 days from the date of the letter and institutions that are found to be noncompliant “with federal civil rights law” may face the potential loss of federal funding. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 10:00 pm
The letter states that the Department will enforce its new directive 14 days from the date of the letter and institutions that are found to be noncompliant “with federal civil rights law” may face the potential loss of federal funding. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 10:00 pm
The letter states that the Department will enforce its new directive 14 days from the date of the letter and institutions that are found to be noncompliant “with federal civil rights law” may face the potential loss of federal funding. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 10:00 pm
The letter states that the Department will enforce its new directive 14 days from the date of the letter and institutions that are found to be noncompliant “with federal civil rights law” may face the potential loss of federal funding. [read post]
