Search for: "People v. Hill"
Results 101 - 120
of 2,088
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2013, 9:55 am
Twain’ Connecticut Yankee v. 63 Clarence had slumped to his knees before I had half finished.... [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:34 am
This argument was successfully run in McCluskey v Edge Hill University (ET Case No. 2405206/07), (although ultimately the employer succeeded in defending the claim on the basis that such a PCP amounted to a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim). [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 12:11 pm
On July 27, 2012, the Court decided People v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 6:35 am
People v. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 9:37 am
On Friday, a federal judge (in Hill v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 12:21 pm
And indeed many restrictions focus on particular places — sidewalks outside people’s homes (Frisby v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 1:42 pm
Tumey v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
On Monday, the Eleventh Circuit, with a pretty tough panel (Chief Judge Edmondson, and Judges Tjoflat and Hill) affirmed a below guidelines sentence in United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:12 am
In Thorpe v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 10:23 am
I think we can all agree that, emotionally, you've got a pretty steep hill to climb -- regardless of the potential merits of your arguments -- in convincing the Ninth Circuit that you deserve relief.Let me also add that you don't do yourself any favors, Ted, by representing yourself. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am
Comment This case is significant for two reasons: First, it tasks the Supreme Court with answering the question raised obiter by Lady Hale in Savage v South Essex NHS Trust [2009] 1 AC 653, namely “what is the extent of the state’s duty to protect all people against an immediate risk of self-harm? [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 4:52 pm
The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments Wednesday on the case Gonzalez v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 3:01 am
Choate, 576 F2d 165, 174-177 (9th Cir. 1978) (government arranged for “mail cover,” under which postal service provided government agency with information appearing on the face of envelopes or packages addressed to defendant); People v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 6:20 am
It turns out, though, that there’s one such defensive use incident I originally missed, but that yielded a Georgia Supreme Court decision just a few weeks ago, in Hill v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 3:09 pm
You can be liable for defaming an individual even if you do not name her.An interesting case is Leopold v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 8:07 pm
(Ilya Somin) In a recent post on Kaur v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 9:48 am
John V. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 4:25 am
Today the court hears oral argument in redistricting cases from Virginia and North Carolina, Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 7:10 am
Supp. 2d 233, 253 n.14 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) and as connoting a racial meaning, see Hill v. [read post]
