Search for: "People v. Marsh" Results 101 - 120 of 214
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2014, 10:14 am by SHG
The name of the case is Paroline v. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 1:40 pm by Alfred Brophy
 I start with the years leading into the Act and how the Supreme Court was moving towards an expansive understanding of the state action doctrine (obviously Marsh v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 7:32 am by Gritsforbreakfast
People in Harris County are being convicted of crimes because they're poor,” said Andrea Marsh, TFDP’s Executive Director. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
First, the answer to confusion is clarity, and overruling Marsh v. [read post]
In particular, we argued that unlike prayers used to open legislative sessions at the state legislative level (one of which was upheld by the Supreme Court, largely on the basis of unbroken historical tradition, in Marsh v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:51 am by James R. Marsh
We hope this sends a powerful message to people interested in child pornography. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
” That was not all of what the Court had said in the Marsh v. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm by Ken White
AF Holdings is owned by a trust called Salt Marsh, the beneficiaries of which are Lutz's own hypothetical and unborn children. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 12:39 pm by Ken Klukowski
and (3) Does the Court decide the case narrowly on grounds rooted in its only legislative-prayer precedent, Marsh v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 7:37 am by Steven Smith
  Is official prayer sui generis and thus outside the scope of standard doctrines, as the decision approving legislative prayer in Marsh v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 10:13 am by Rick Garnett
  Or, they could hold simply that the 1983 Marsh v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 8:00 am by Eric Rassbach
They also know that the legislative prayers in this case, which were delivered by volunteer Christians, Jews, Bahá’ís, and Wiccans, are far more inclusive than the prayers upheld in Marsh v. [read post]