Search for: "People v. Wiley" Results 101 - 120 of 160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2013, 12:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
Anderson-Wiley, 664 F.3d 865, 882 (11th Cir. 2011) (Pryor, J., concurring) (noting this as an example). [read post]
27 May 2011, 3:16 pm
The case has been pending for several years before Second Circuit Court Judge Denny Chin under Authors Guild v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:05 pm
The other, published in 2008, is Rebecca Ordish and Alan Adcock's China Intellectual Property Challenges and Solutions (Wiley, details here). [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 5:13 pm
The people directly involved often endure considerable expense and suffering, whereas the benefits of setting a precedent accrue to the rest of us. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 2:43 pm by Ronald Mann
There is a recent case (Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,) in which the justices adopted a broad rule of exhaustion under copyright law, but that case affords little guidance because the Copyright Act, unlike the Patent Act, codifies the exhaustion doctrine. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 9:00 am by John N. Davis
The case is, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Discussant: Bert Rein, Founding Partner, Wiley Rein Zauderer: easy cases make bad law. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 9:23 am by Shamnad Basheer
Pranesh further criticized the decision of Justice Manmohan Singh of the Delhi High Court in John Wiley v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am by John Elwood
But since it’s already been discussed by way smarter people, it’s a perfect candidate for (prescription strength) Relist Watch SelectTM, which begins right now. ============================================================ Returning Relists Sireci v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Feels a bit like giving in, though.Anyway: Transcript of oral argument, for those who prefer not to read secondhand postmortems.Supreme Court post-argument discussion at AU's Washington College of Law: Pom Wonderful v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 2:55 pm by Gordon Firemark
Copyright Termination cases (Village People and Ray Charles kids)   Village People New York Times. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Bruce Joseph, Wiley Rein LLP: Section 512(a), conduit function—that both retrospectively and prospectively is working right and the balance will continue to be right 20 years from now. [read post]