Search for: "People v. Henry" Results 101 - 120 of 991
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2011, 1:39 pm by David Zaring
  Nobody grows up hoping to one day be Henry Kravis's water carrier on a big M&A deal. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:00 pm by Mary A. Fischer
  “When staggering numbers of people were proven conclusively innocent of crimes they didn’t commit, a lot of people said, wait a minute, what kind of finality are we talking about if we’re talking about executing people who might be innocent. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:10 am by Eugene Volokh
Likewise, Aldous Huxley used Henry Ford's name as a deity-like reference in his 1931 novel Brave New World. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 4:30 am by Debra Vey Voda-Hamilton
On Sunday, as I was reading the NY Times, a pastime of probably 95% of the world, I came across an article entitled Casey Greenfield v. the World. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 9:32 am by Ross Davies
Dorsen, Henry Friendly, Greatest Judge of His Era (Harvard University Press 2012) - J. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 2:47 am
Henry, No. 04-15919 (12-19-07). [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 11:48 am by Jack Sharman
And the additional details about Holmes andWatson in the ten late stories do indeed make for a more“rounded,” in the sense of a fuller, portrayal of these characters.In much the same way we learn things about Sir JohnFalstaff in Henry IV, Part 2, in Henry V (though he doesn’t actuallyappear in that play but is merely discussed in it), andin The Merry Wives of Windsor, that were not remarked in hisfirst appearance, in Henry IV, Part 1. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 5:25 pm by Daniel Nazer
In December of this year, Jack Henry won again, with the judge ruling that the asserted claims of the ’003 patent are invalid as abstract under Alice v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
DonovanRethinking People v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 8:16 am by Christine Corcos
It is no stretch to say that Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes created the modern First Amendment a hundred years ago in his dissent in Schenck v. [read post]