Search for: "People v. Lambert" Results 101 - 120 of 149
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2011, 11:13 am
To establish a false advertising claim, Pernod must prove the following under Warner-Lambert v Breathasure (2000), that:Bacardi made false or misleading statements as to his own product [or another's];there is actual deception or at least a tendency to deceive a substantial portion of the intended audience;the deception is material in that it is likely to influence purchasing decisions;the advertised goods travel in interstate commerce; andthere is a likelihood of injury to… [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm by Bexis
Warner–Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2007), presumed to know more about Michigan law than either the Michigan courts (Taylor v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:56 am
Louis Vuitton v Plesner. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:06 pm by Behr, McCarter & Potter, P.C.
The circuit court found that the Oklahoma court lacked personal jurisdiction over Frazee, but the Supreme Court of Missouri reversed in People’s Bank v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
A candid camera, Paul Lambert, New Law Journal N.L.J. (2010) Vol.160 No.7445 pg.1699-1700. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 7:35 am by Andres
The case is that of Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd v Meltwater Holding BV [2010] EWHC 3099 (Ch). [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 9:32 am by Thom Lambert
Usual caveats for a Lambert weekend post: Post is off-topic for this blog and represents my own opinion only. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 8:42 pm by cdw
” [via FindLaw] People v. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:32 pm by cdw
” [via FindLaw] People v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
They save people's lives every day - that's their job - and not incidentally they prescribe our clients' products while doing that. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:10 pm
If a Court finds that 2 or more people are responsible for a motor vehicle collision in British Columbia the Court must ‘apportion’ liability as between them. [read post]