Search for: "People v. Sample"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,949
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2019, 10:01 pm
post regarding the ubiquitous Apple v....Read the whole entry... [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 9:03 pm
Patient samples were taken in late July and early August. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 5:15 pm
Levow is a DWI attorney who fights for the rights of people in New Jersey who are facing charges that could significantly affect their lives. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:27 am
After the Supreme Court’s decision in Maryland v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 3:34 pm
Supreme Court so decided in Stogner v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 9:22 am
Sick people’s samples were collected from May 29, 2024, to July 19, 2024. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
(And keep in mind that in Davis v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
In Murdock v Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943), the U.S. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:43 pm
Jackson v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 5:00 pm
DUI law is actually more complex than most people realize, and the recent case of Coffey v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 5:32 pm
R. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 9:15 am
The allowance for women over sixty years old to give a smaller breath sample seems fair as long as the courts also exempt people who have heart, lung or other chest related and documented medical problems that would prevent them from giving a breath sample. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 5:32 pm
R. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 6:31 pm
The software analyzed a DNA sample obtained by swabbing a weapon, a sample that likely contained the DNA of multiple people. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 10:05 am
Related Cases: Maryland v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 10:36 am
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 2:23 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in Maryland v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 3:00 pm
Related Cases: Center for Genetics and Society v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 3:36 pm
Related Cases: California v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm
Thus, the government employees who prepared the records were “not defendant's accuser[s]' in any but the most attenuated sense”, and the breath test documents were properly admitted in evidence over defendant's objection based on the Confrontation Clause (internal citations omitted).It should be noted that some local courts have held otherwise (People v Carreira, 27 Misc3d [Watertown City Ct 2010]; People v. [read post]