Search for: "Phillips v. Hand" Results 101 - 120 of 620
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Carter Phillips, the Respondents’ counsel, brilliantly summarized the policy’s implication of this case as a problem of “pirates v. trolls. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 10:48 am
The second case argued on December 10, 2008, AT&T v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:29 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
There are no Supreme Court judgments to be handed down this week. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 6:30 am by Gabriel Cheong
Landmark Gay Marriage Couple Divorces In the landmark Massachusetts case of Goodridge v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 5:36 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
[For a more interesting case on gifts see More on Phillips v. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 5:07 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.January 9, 2008 - 2 PM: In re Phillips Farms, LLC, Serial No. 78669171 [Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusal of the mark PETIT-PETITE for wine].Petite SyrahJanuary 10, 2008 - 2 PM: Digi Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 9:33 am
I was in Washington earlier today to watch oral arguments in Ricci v. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 3:40 pm
Phillip Watts Enter., Inc., 560 So.2d 339, 341 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:44 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
In the Trigger litigation, the Supreme Court held (Lord Phillips dissenting) on a consideration of Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services[5] that the relevant date on which employers’ liability insurance policies will be triggered is the date (or dates) on which the victim was exposed to the asbestos, not the date when mesothelioma first manifests in the victim. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 3:46 am
The Fourth Department handed down four legal malpractice decisions this week, which is surely a record. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 7:41 am
In re Schmitz, No. 07-0581 [granted on 2-15-2008 and discussed here] Now being argued Tuesday, April 22, 2008 at Texas Tech in Lubbock Phillips v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 8:56 am by Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen Retractable Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]