Search for: "Plante v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 4,519
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2009, 12:23 pm by Paul M. Rashkind
The state planted another defendant in his cell as a "human listening device," even though Ventris’ right to counsel had attached. [read post]
The CPP aimed to effect this shift by setting stringent goals for each state to cut power plant emissions by 2030. [read post]
13 May 2013, 11:00 am by Todd Janzen
S. 617, 625, and confers on the purchaser, or any subsequent owner, “the right to use [or] sell” the thing as he sees fit, United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
 The court of appeals stated that the citizen suit provision would apply if IEEC had violated a term or condition of the permit, or if IEEC had sought to begin building and operating the power plant without obtaining a permit under SCAQMD’s merged Title V/construction permit system. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 1:17 pm by WIMS
Moreover, the injunction improperly applied home state law extraterritorially, in direct contradiction to the Supreme Court's decision in International Paper Co. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:29 am by Allison C. Smith
Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision in EME Homer City Generation, L.P. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:24 am
The Federal plan, by necessity, is adequate because the plan is but a stricter version of the satisfactory emissions limits already applied by the Plant and implemented throughout the State of New Mexico. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 8:29 pm by Lyle Denniston
” Urging en banc rehearing, the state argued that the Circuit Court decision conflicts directly with a Supreme Court ruling in 1987 — International Paper Co. v. [read post]