Search for: "ROGERS v. UNITED STATES" Results 101 - 120 of 1,662
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2017, 11:20 am by Laura Davis, AFPD, FDSET
Last February, Judges Merritt, Batchelder, and Rogers announced in Turner v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 5:24 am by Roger Alford
by Roger Alford Yesterday voters in Oklahoma voted overwhelmingly (70% in favor to 30% against) to ban the use of international law and Sharia law in state courts. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 4:28 pm
"On Wednesday, CAAF will hear argument in United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 11:42 am
Clearly there is magic in the name, and Fame Jeans tried to capture that magic by registering Jack & Jones as a trademark in the United States. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 10:21 am
It is not often that the United States Supreme Court hears a family law case, so the Court's June, 2011, ruling in Turner v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 3:56 am by INFORRM
The decision of Mr Justice Nicklin in Craig Wright v Roger Ver ([2019] EWHC 2094 (QB)) confirms the high hurdle that a claimant must overcome in a defamation case where section 9 of the Defamation Act 2013 applies. [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:10 pm by Sumter Camp
A couple of recent decisions by the Court of Appeals shed light on some very practical aspects of a criminal trial practice.Double Jeopardy and Child PornographyIn United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:01 pm by H. Scott Leviant
However, as the case approached trial, the United States Supreme Court reversed a grant of class certification in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 3:55 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
It also engages the American Indian experience in the United States, particularly the experience of urban Indians who have been uprooted from their native lands and disconnected from their heritage and history. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:16 pm by Lauren Kuley
Good Faith and Probable Cause: In another en banc decision, Judge John Rogers and eleven others held in United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 9:03 pm
United States that the plaintiff had an individual right to challenge a violation of the VCCR. [read post]