Search for: "Rand v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 219
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2015, 9:30 am
But here are a few titles you might not expect to see on a “banned books” list: Sketching Basics Batman: Eye of the Beholder Rand McNally Family World Atlas E=MC2: Simple Physics Acupressure for Emotional Healing Arizona Wildlife Views The Onion Book of Known Knowledge Merck Manual of Medical Information: Home Edition Mythology of Greece and Rome Dragonology: The Complete Book of Dragons For an interactive infographic featuring classic books once banned inside the… [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 9:11 am
Additional Resources: Rand Paul’s Social Security Falsehoods Are a Disservice to the Country, September 25, 2015, Huffington Post, by Alex Lawson More Blog Entries:Hanson v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
As I explained in an earlier Verdict column, under the most natural reading of both the text of the Fourteenth Amendment and the leading case construing it—the 1898 ruling in United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:12 pm
The Amendment’s text reads:All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.This powerful piece of constitutional text has ensured for 150 years that whatever else happens to people at the bottom rungs of American society, whose own legal status in our polity may be doubtful, their children, at least, are full legal citizens of the… [read post]
1 May 2015, 3:00 am
A big case was argued this week before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:52 am
Related Issues: Computer Fraud And Abuse Act ReformRelated Cases: United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 11:28 am
Rand Paul, M.D., who most certainly should know better. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 11:03 am
ObamaKlayman v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 2:43 pm
In the 1996 case of Whren v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
10 May 2014, 9:25 am
Sincerely, Robert V. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 9:24 pm
Or both.United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
Bernard v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:05 am
Archer, 531 F.3d 1347, 1352 (11th Cir. 2008), and United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 12:40 pm
Judge Holderman also compares the number he arrived at with a jury award in Ericsson v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 7:38 am
At least in Germany, the largest European market, there is no eBay v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 11:42 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has already issued one ruling in Apple's favor against Google's Motorola (reversing and remanding an ITC ruling, which Google just asked it to reconsider), was clearly leaning Apple's way last month with respect to its continued pursuit of a permanent injunction against Samsung, and based on how today's appellate hearing on Judge Richard Posner's June 2012 dismissal of a two-way Apple v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 11:51 am
The Microsoft v. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm
In my previous post I published the dissenting views of Commissioner Pinkert, one of the six chiefs of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC), from the majority decision granting Samsung (unless vetoed by the United States Trade Representative or reversed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) an exclusion order against older iPhones and iPads. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 12:08 pm
This is my second post today on Wednesday's filings in the Microsoft v. [read post]
