Search for: "Rather v. City & County of San Francisco"
Results 101 - 120
of 175
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2015, 1:54 pm
Municipal Court of the City and County of San Francisco (1967) and Marshall v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 11:39 am
In a published opinion filed September 28, 2017, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the Alameda County Superior Court’s judgment denying appellant Living Rivers Council’s (LRC) writ petition challenging the State Water Resources Control Board’s (the “SWRCB” or “Board”) approval of a policy designed to maintain instream flows in coastal streams north of San Francisco. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 11:39 am
In a published opinion filed September 28, 2017, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the Alameda County Superior Court’s judgment denying appellant Living Rivers Council’s (LRC) writ petition challenging the State Water Resources Control Board’s (the “SWRCB” or “Board”) approval of a policy designed to maintain instream flows in coastal streams north of San Francisco. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:43 am
San Francisco, 545 U.S. 323, 345, 125 S. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:40 pm
PG&E owns and operates the Diablo Canyon plant, a two-unit nuclear power plant on 750-acres of land also owned by PG&E near Avila Beach in San Luis Obispo County. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:21 am
City and County of San Francisco; and (2) whether, alternatively, federal courts can and should waive Williamson County’s state litigation requirement for prudential reasons when a federal takings claim is factually concrete without state procedures, as some circuit courts hold, or apply the requirement as a rigid jurisdictional barrier, as other circuits hold. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 11:51 am
., County of Orange v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2013) 217 Cal.App.4th 540 [city did not prematurely approve community center/affordable housing project]; Taxpayers for Accountable School Board Spending v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 10:38 am
Haskell County Board of Comm’rs (10th Cir. 2009) (citizen had standing because “whenever he visits the courthouse square for [various] purpose[s], he cannot avoid the [Ten Commandments] Monument”); American Atheists, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 11:14 am
Protect Niles v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann’s 2022 4th Quarter cumulative CEQA update. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 3:14 pm
S. 825 and Dolan v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:21 am
City and County of San Francisco, 93 Cal. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:19 am
Santa Clara County, which clears the way for “cities and counties to hire private lawyers, and offer them a share of the proceeds, when suing companies for the huge costs of cleaning up lead paint. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
In Lockyer v City & County of San Francisco, the California Supreme Court explained that the regulation of marriage in California is committed to state officials, so that the mayor of San Francisco had no authority to “take any action with regard to the process of issuing marriage licenses or registering marriage certificates. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
San Francisco. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 10:12 am
Host Compliance, LLC is a San Francisco-based company that helps cities and counties enforce STR laws. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 11:25 am
” (Citing Save San Francisco Bay Assn. v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
City and County of San Francisco, 14-704, which in addition to the four relists also has been rescheduled once, asks whether the Second Amendment bars a San Francisco ordinance requiring all residents who keep handguns in their homes to stow them in a lock box or disable them with a trigger lock whenever the owners are not carrying them on their persons. [read post]
5 May 2025, 7:46 am
From the New York Times: “On Thursday, thousands of lawyers were expected to protest at federal courthouses in New York, Chicago and San Francisco — roughly 50 cities in all. [read post]
