Search for: "Rodriguez v. Superior Court" Results 101 - 120 of 154
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2009, 6:20 am by Jon L. Gelman
Upon that filing, the statement or order, as the case may be, shall have the same effect and may be collected and docketed in the same manner as judgments rendered in causes tried in the Superior Court. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
Superior Court, 79 P.3d 556, 563 (Cal. 2003).Lower California courts, but not the California Supreme Court, have cited Restatement Third §2 with approval. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 9:48 am by Patricia Hughes
The 2019 Quebec Superior Court decision in Truchon held that the foreseeability requirement in the Criminal Code and the parallel Quebec provision in that province’s End-of-Life Care Act are unconstitutional. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 11:26 am by Rich Vetstein
Citing property and trespass law from centuries ago, Massachusetts Superior Court Justice Frances A. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:07 am by Russell Knight
” In re Marriage of Rodriguez, 545 NE 2d 731 – Ill: Supreme Court 1989 Whatever was forgotten better be really important. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Jacob Pagano
For Lynch, the government’s “superior knowledge” about the implications of burden allocation  “reinforces [the] conclusion that the political branches should decide such questions in the first instance. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, December 17, 2008 US v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 10:36 pm by Marie Louise
(Docket Report) District Court Minnesota: Res judicata bars patent claims that could have been asserted in earlier trademark case involving the ‘Same technology and the same accused products’: Superior Industries, LLC v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 6:43 am by Joy Waltemath
Reversing the contrary decision of an appellate court, the New Jersey Supreme Court concluded that there was not a sufficient showing that the employee’s death resulted from a “work effort or strain” within the meaning of the more stringent statutory requirements for establishing a compensable claim for cardiovascular injury disease or death (Renner v AT&T, July 30, 2014, Rodriguez, P). [read post]