Search for: "Rodriguez v. Superior Court"
Results 101 - 120
of 143
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Citing the 1999 Court of Appeals decision in O’Shea v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 9:37 am
The United States Supreme Court has previously held, in the landmark case Garcetti v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm
The Court chooses a superior principle to resolve the cases, and establishes brick-by-brick (or in President Lenaert’s words “stone by stone”) an internal hierarchy between various Treaty norms and values. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 9:48 am
The 2019 Quebec Superior Court decision in Truchon held that the foreseeability requirement in the Criminal Code and the parallel Quebec provision in that province’s End-of-Life Care Act are unconstitutional. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:35 am
Supreme Court cases beginning with Plessy v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 4:28 am
John, and Vernoia.On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Camden County, Docket No. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:07 am
” In re Marriage of Rodriguez, 545 NE 2d 731 – Ill: Supreme Court 1989 Whatever was forgotten better be really important. [read post]
14 Mar 2025, 12:30 pm
In 2020, Vermont Superior Court transitions to electronic filing. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 12:01 pm
The 2016 California Court of Appeal decision in Rodriguez v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 7:07 am
Under Rodriguez v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, December 17, 2008 US v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
As the Court put the point in 1989 in Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:49 am
United States and Hill v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Supreme Court, June 02, 2008 US v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 9:53 am
The panel I moderated that day in April 2008 had panelists: Barbara Rodriguez Mundell, Presiding Judge, Superior Court for Maricopa County Maurice Portley, Judge, Arizona Court of Appeals Pendleton Gaines, Judge, Superior Court for Maricopa County Dan McAuliffe, State Bar President Ed Novak, State Bar President-Elect That’s a great group of folks to sit around and talk about anything. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 2:17 pm
The Court held that the superior court does not have discretion in sentencing when a firearm restriction is statutorily mandated and the legislature included no discretion to waive or limit the firearm restriction, and ordered the provision stricken from the judgment and sentence. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
