Search for: "STATE v SHOOK" Results 101 - 120 of 262
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2015, 10:17 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
KokeshCase Number: 09-cv-01021 (United States District Court for the District of New Mexico)Case Filed: October 27, 2009Qualifying Judgment/Order: March 30, 2015 4/30/15 7/29/15 2015-39 SEC v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 1:37 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
KokeshCase Number: 09-cv-01021 (United States District Court for the District of New Mexico)Case Filed: October 27, 2009Qualifying Judgment/Order: March 30, 2015 4/30/15 7/29/15 2015-39 SEC v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 2:09 pm by Michelle Yeary
  So, there is also no question that plaintiff’s state law claims are preempted under Riegel v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 4:36 am by SHG
Nevertheless, she also stated that “race-conscious admissions policies must be limited in time. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 6:00 am by Wystan Ackerman
Psychology of Legal Ethics: Kevin Underhill of Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP presented on this topic. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Shook Hardy & Bacon Blog-Tolerant I had to search and then read through Kevin Underhill's bio to find this blog mentioned. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 5:17 am by Michael C. Dorf
TarrowWhen, on June 24th, the Supreme Court effectively liquidated Roe v Wade, scholars of social movements and abortion rights shook their heads – but not in disbelief. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:57 am
In addition, both parties’ representatives shook hands after reaching the original deal, stating something to the effect of “we have a deal. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 6:43 am by Schachtman
Sellers, quoted Mark Behrens, of Shook, Hardy & Bacon, as stating that: “This case is part of an emerging national attack on state workers’ compensation systems by the personal injury bar. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 11:30 am by William A. Ruskin
To illustrate their point, the SH&B lawyers discuss the Third Circuit’s opinion in Greenspan v. [read post]