Search for: "Securities Co. v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 4,182
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2010, 10:39 am by Derek J. Lindenschmidt
Interestingly, although the bill may be inextricably linked with General Security Indemnity Co. of Arizona v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 9:53 am
On July 25, 2015, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued the much-anticipated ruling on class certification in Erica P. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 10:36 am by Blake Osborn
Just before the clock struck 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit weighed in on the constitutionality of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC” or “Commission”) administrative law judges. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 9:07 am by Tom Webley
On June 23, 2014, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its much-anticipated decision in Halliburton Co., et al. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:03 pm by John Stigi
This decision establishes important limits on SLUSA preclusion and the scope of the United States Supreme Court’s seminal SLUSA decision, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 11:36 am by Adam Ettinger
Nearly all of these token sales have been characterized by their promoters as the sales of digital assets or currencies, rather than as the sale of securities, and have not been registered as securities in the United States. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 11:36 am by Adam Ettinger
Nearly all of these token sales have been characterized by their promoters as the sales of digital assets or currencies, rather than as the sale of securities, and have not been registered as securities in the United States. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:23 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Halliburton Co., the United States Supreme Court held that in connection with a motion for class certification in a securities class action lawsuit, a defendant should have the opportunity to try to rebut the presumption of reliance by showing that the alleged misrepresentation did not impact the defendant company’s share price. [read post]
Ct. 2398 (2014) (“Halliburton II“), where the United States Supreme Court held that a defendant in a securities fraud class action could introduce evidence of a lack of price impact at the class certification stage to show the absence of predominance. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 10:56 am
Will the United States Supreme Court’s decision on Halliburton impact Canadian securities class actions? [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 5:54 am
Rather, the Court stated that “Section 10(b) reaches the use of a manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance only in connection with the purchase or sale of a security listed on an American stock exchange, and the purchase or sale of any other security in the United States. [read post]