Search for: "Smith v. United States of America" Results 101 - 120 of 699
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2014, 1:14 pm by Francisco Macías
:  GPO, United States Commission of Civil Rights, 1970. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 6:14 am by NCC Staff
Current President Donald Trump is now part of the case, called Smith v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Bartrum, The Curious Case of Legislative Prayer: Town of Greece v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm by NARF
Buzzard (Major Crimes Act; Discovery; Cherokee Nation) United States v. [read post]
Ali, a United States citizen, flew to Egypt last September to bring home to America his wife of four years, Marwa, and their young daughter, Mariam. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Smith, Social Media Regulation in the Wake of 303 Creative v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 5:01 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
(Yamaha-America), its wholly owned domestic subsidiary and exclusive importer and distributor in the United States. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:29 am
(collectively, “MadStad”) filed suit against the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”), its then director, David Kappos, in his official capacity, and the United States of America (collectively, “the Government”) in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 2:11 pm by Barbara Moreno
Mary Ziegler, Abortion and the Law in America:  Roe v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
Since the Leahy–Smith America Invents Act (“AIA”) became effective in 2012, Inter Partes Review (“IPR”) has been a popular legal option for challenging patent validity. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Calo, Constructing the Secular: Law and Religion Jurisprudence in Europe and the United States (September 2014).Adam Lamparello, 'God Hates Fags' Is Not the Same as 'Fuck the Draft': Introducing the Non-Sexual Obscenity Doctrine, (October 8, 2014).Nadia B. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 8:13 am by Marci Hamilton
Maynard); (3) harm to others is a limit on free exercise (Reynolds; United States v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie observes that Monday’s decision in Epic Systems v. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 9:30 pm by Emily Prifogle
United States (University of Washington Press) by Gordon K. [read post]