Search for: "Sours v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 423
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2015, 8:28 am by Jon Sands
And the absence of mental-health testimony at the guilt phase might have soured the jury at the penalty phase.The decision is here:http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2015/06/09/12-99005.pdfLee v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 3:05 pm by Michael S. Snarr
A February 2006 fact sheet published by the Foreign Agriculture Service explains that the SPS Agreement was adopted during the Uruguay Round with the support of “[v]irtually all countries, including the United States” because countries previously had used vague and opaque SPS measures to disguise restrictions on trade. [read post]
22 Jul 2007, 10:56 am
Updating this ILB entry from July 17th, about the trial court ruling last week following the April 27th Supreme Court decision in the case of Naugle v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:45 am by Venkat
Domino's Pizza, Inc., et al., for a similar result under state law in a text spam case brought in Washington.) [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 6:16 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
He's correct, at least under most states' laws.The Court of Appeals of New York clarified the "implied covenant" rule in Bessemer Trust Co. v. [read post]