Search for: "State v. Atkins"
Results 101 - 120
of 676
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2006, 8:06 am
United States, 92 U.S. 105 (1876); Tenet v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:35 am
Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 12:12 pm
Virginia when a state employs a cutoff IQ score of 75 on a single test to preclude Atkins relief. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am
Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 3:13 pm
Florida and Atkins v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 9:40 am
Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional to execute offenders with mental retardation in the case of Atkins v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 6:37 am
The United States Supreme Court this morning took up two capital cases from Texas, Moore v. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 8:35 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 3:08 pm
State v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 9:53 am
Edwards v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court had yet to announce the constitutional rule, under Atkins v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:05 pm
But, in its decision in Atkins v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 7:17 am
True enough, when we got the judgment for seven (theoretical) figures in Louis Vuitton v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 3:08 pm
State v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:42 pm
“I appreciate Governor Newsom’s continued commitment to solving one of the most vexing issues facing our state – increasing the amount of housing and widening access for more Californians,” said Senate Pro Tem Atkins (D-San Diego). [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 4:21 pm
In 2002, in Atkins v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:27 am
Chapleau, 62 F.3d 167 (6th Cir.1995), that competency determinations are mixed questions of law and fact, it concluded that the subsequent United States Supreme Court holding in Thompson v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 9:42 pm
On Monday the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Bobby v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 11:03 am
It has been more than a decade since the Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 2:19 pm
As a result, he says, Justice Roberts understated the costs of the rule when he wrote recently, in Herring v. [read post]
