Search for: "State v. Badger" Results 101 - 120 of 204
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2015, 5:12 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Court in Matter of Curtis "N" (288 AD2d 774 [3d Dept 2001], lv denied 97 NY2d 610 [2002]) relied on a line of Family Court Article 6 (custody/visitation) cases finding that incarceration alone does not render visitation with the imprisoned parent inappropriate (Badger v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 11:43 am
Badger Acquisition of Tampa LLC, 983 So. 2d 1175, 1183-1184 (Fla. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm
On the same blog, IPKat team member Jeremy notes an extempore decision of Mr Justice Arnold on the difficult question of controlling uncapped costs in patent proceedings that are more easily afforded by one party than another, in Canon v Badger. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 2:23 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Scheindlin of the Southern District of New York in Martinez-Done v. [read post]
In 1967, we represented Mildred and Richard Loving in their successful fight to end state bans on inter-racial marriage, in the landmark case Loving v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 11:20 am by Mary Whisner
Post, May 15, 2014Emily Badger, Housing Segregation Is Holding Back the Promise of Brown v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 4:58 pm by Roy Black
In the beginning I had little interest in the Oscar Pistorius trial; only after reading descriptions of Gerrie “The Bull Dog” Nel’s cross-examination of Pistorius (OP) did I pay attention. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:56 pm
 Well, the current draft of the Nagoya implementing regulation is a worthy inheritor of this lamented heritage.Did somebody say "Badger"? [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:08 am by Stephen Bilkis
Therefore, the plaintiffs could not use their right to discovery to badger the defendants for information. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 8:00 am by Eric Rassbach
The hypothetical badgering official would contravene this element. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 5:00 pm by Simon Chester
It's the end of an era And he made new law on the extent to which litigants can badger a non-party in depositions: see 197 F.3d 922 (1999) MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET MATTER # 1, Appellees, v. [read post]