Search for: "State v. Dixon" Results 101 - 120 of 579
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2018, 10:17 am
The Court also noted the NZ Supreme Court decision in R v Dixon [2015] NZSC 147 [see here], holding that digital CCTV footage was both a ‘document’ and ‘property’ under the NZ Crimes Act 1961. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In reducing Wilson’s award the Court of Appeal stated that Judge Dixon had given too much weight to the upward trajectory of Wilson’s career and that economic loss had to be proved by the cancellation of a project. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Walter Dellinger
  The relevant briefs and memoranda are: The Sept. 24, 1973, OLC Dixon memo The Oct. 5, 1973, brief for the United States in In re Agnew The Feb. 12, 1974, memorandum to Independent Counsel Leon Jaworski The June 21, 1974, reply brief for the United States in U.S. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
United States Summer Zervos’ defamation claim [read post]
27 May 2018, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
IPSO Rulings               IPSO has published a series of rulings and three Resolution Statements from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 18923-17 Dixon v The Sun, resolved via IPSO mediation Resolution Statement 20931-17 Dixon v Sun.co.uk, resolved via IPSO mediation Resolution Statement – 00918-18 Dixon v Mail Online, resolved via ISPO mediation 00916-18… [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:10 am by Jon Sands
The 9th looks at Dixon v US, 548 US 1 (2006), which states “knowingly” merely requires proof of knowledge, unless the text dictates otherwise. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
United States The Washington Post notes that Amazon is revolutionising its delivery system, allowing for delivery to individuals parked vehicles. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Wilson v Bauer Media (Costs) [2018] VSC 161 John Dixon J ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff’s costs on an indemnity basis. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
In addition, IPSO published three resolution statements: 18927-17 Dixon v Daily Mirror: 18928-17 Dixon v Daily Express: 18929-17 Dixon v Daily Star: Statements in Open Court and Apologies We have already mentioned the apology of  Ben Bradley MP to Jeremy Corbyn. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Gill v Anagnost, Crews and Grenier (United States) A libel action brought in the New Hampshire state court concerning the posting of defamatory statements on a billboard by mortgage broker Michael Gill. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:00 am by Christopher Tyner
Supreme Court heard arguments this week in Carpenter v. [read post]