Search for: "State v. Jeffers"
Results 101 - 115
of 115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2011, 3:45 am
” That echoed the analysis of the 11th District a few years back in State v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
(United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
Jeffers, [813 S.W.2d 449, 451 (Tenn. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:47 pm
Other Superior Court judges named Wednesday are: Mark V. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 8:06 am
United States v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 4:20 pm
That's Jeffers v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 1:35 pm
Preemption Under The LMRA The Court of Appeals pancaked a former player for the Carolina Panthers in Jeffers v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 4:42 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 9:00 pm
Jeffers said: "We have heretofore explained that '[a] single conspiracy exists, when the conspiracy had the same objective, it had the same goal, the same nature, the same geographic spread, the same results, and the same product.' United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 8:50 am
One of the author's partners, Marilyn Barrett -- a former chair of the Taxation Section of the State Bar of California and the Los Angeles County Bar Association and who works in the Tax Department of Jeffer Mangels Butler & Marmaro LLP -- assists clients on corporate and partnership tax matters and tax controversy matters, and serves as outside general counsel to mid-market public and privately held companies. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Jeffer Mangels Butler & Marmaro Blog-Proud Jeffer Mangels lists their blogs on their "News/Blogs" section of their home page. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 6:44 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 10:00 am
Michael Hassen of Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro, who publishes the Class Action Defense Blog put up an interesting post last month about a case called Guevarra v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 10:59 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Dwight Wayne Jeffers v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 3:10 pm
Bryant and Cohen both highlighted the developing doctrine that federal regulation preempts state laws and state courts as a threat to the legal system. [read post]