Search for: "State v. Lowe" Results 101 - 120 of 10,518
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Introduction: Jeanne Fromer Private actors pursue their own interests. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:45 am by Trent Dykes
The Governor has stated that she remains committed to enacting noncompete legislation protecting “middle-class and low-wage earners,” and Senator Sean Ryan, who sponsored SB S3100A, has indicated that noncompete legislation will be reintroduced this year. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:52 am by Ivan Horodyskyy
Damage to the plaintiffs’ property by the armed forces of the Russian Federation constitutes an exception to the state’s judicial immunity, in line with customary international law, which, according to the Court, is confirmed in Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts and in practice of the International Court of Justice (North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany/Netherlands) Case) and practice of the European Court of… [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 3:44 am by SHG
” And yet, in his five-page dissent from the denial of cert in Coalition for TJ v. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Quoting an article by Felix Frankfurter from 1916, and also citing Ernst Freund, Post states that Progressives had repudiated Lochner v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 10:48 am by Jeffrey Randa
That the petitioner has the ability and motivation to drive safely and within the law. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by Steven Schwartzapfel
Des Moines | United States Courts Criminal Cases | United States Courts [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
  Some lawsuits may be low-odds rolls of the dice by well-funded trade groups. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm by Michael Lowe
According to the USSC: 9% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I); 7% were CHC II; 8% were CHC III; 2% were CHC IV; 5% were CHC V; 9% were CHC VI. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:01 pm
So for that issue, absent anything new (like the Supreme Court stepping in and saying that its earlier dicta about the scope of state law in Viking River Cruises was correct), we pretty much know at this point how these things will go in both federal and state court.Judge Lee adds a concurrence that has little to do with the substance of the court's holding but that he nonetheless feels is important to add just so employers don't potentially get stuck with issue… [read post]