Search for: "State v. Miner"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,385
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2023, 4:15 am
The question in Brooke-Willbanks v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 7:36 am
It is styled, Spurlock v. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 1:20 pm
In Hill v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 8:12 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:12 am
On June 2, 2017 the Louisiana Second Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court’s judgment cancelling a mineral lease under Mineral Code article 140 and provided further clarity on a production in paying quantities analysis under Louisiana Mineral Code article 124.[1] The dispute in Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:12 am
On June 2, 2017 the Louisiana Second Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court’s judgment cancelling a mineral lease under Mineral Code article 140 and provided further clarity on a production in paying quantities analysis under Louisiana Mineral Code article 124.[1] The dispute in Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:12 am
On June 2, 2017 the Louisiana Second Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court’s judgment cancelling a mineral lease under Mineral Code article 140 and provided further clarity on a production in paying quantities analysis under Louisiana Mineral Code article 124.[1] The dispute in Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 8:00 am
Stated otherwise, until the Lyles seek to develop their minerals, Midway owes no duty to the Lyles respecting the surface usage. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 12:39 pm
Mukasey, 534 F.3d at 188 (quoting Council of Alternative Political Parties v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 8:28 am
Here is the unpublished opinion. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 11:53 am
A pro-business entity -- the California Construction and Industrial Minerals Association -- sued, claiming that the ordinance was, among other things, inconsistent with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which, as you likely know, is a pro-environmental statute. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 4:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:00 am
See Marin v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 2:47 am
In Williams v. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 2:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 12:18 pm
The court was particularly persuaded of this considering how the Louisiana Supreme Court has defined the relationship between unit operators and unleased mineral owners, as well as considering the prior ruling in J&L Family, LLC v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:55 am
The United States Supreme Court recently issued an opinion that effects many Texas property and mineral owners. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
Nat’l Assoc. of Mfrs v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 8:46 am
El Dorado Chemical Company v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 8:22 pm
With a 6-3 decision in Sorrell v. [read post]
