Search for: "State of Alabama v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 2,124
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
The State of Texas, joined by 25 others states, filed a lawsuit to block this executive action, which affects between 4 and 5 million immigrants in the United States. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 8:13 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 8:17 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 4:49 pm
District Court for the Northern District of Alabama 2015). [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 7:22 am
All placements of insurance in the United States are generally subject to state premium taxation, but the responsible taxpayer depends on the type of insurance policy issued. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:51 am
Chafin filed for divorce and for child custody in Alabama state court. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 4:05 am
In In re Higgs v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:09 am
There shouldn’t be uncovered states and covered states; there should be the United States. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:19 pm
State, the Alabama Supreme Court had this to say: In answering this question in the negative, this Court finds persuasive the rational and holding in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 11:57 am
In United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 8:24 am
All briefing in Magwood v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:41 am
Alabama, and Arkansas, Jackson v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am
Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 8:28 am
The State of Alabama, along with U.S. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 10:59 pm
No. 07A630 Title: James Callahan, Applicant [www.supremecourtus.gov] v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 5:37 am
Patterson, 357 U.S. 449 (1958), which held the State of Alabama could not force the civil rights organization to disclose its membership list. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 6:22 am
Here is the complaint in United States ex rel. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 10:19 am
Here is the abstract: In June 2012, the United States Supreme Court held in Miller v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:57 am
Alabama. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 6:27 pm
Massey Coal Co. case pending before the United States Supreme Court and they have done so without even reading my brief. . . . [read post]
