Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 12,634
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2022, 6:05 am
United States, 530 U. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 5:36 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:41 am
United States is not law. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 2:38 pm
The first of the two closely-watched same sex marriage cases to be argued before the United States this morning prompted much tweeting and predictions, as well as the promised early release of the audio by the Supreme Court itself. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:01 pm
United States, 509 U.S. 602 (1993). [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 11:01 am
On December 14, 2009, the United States Supreme Court granted review in the case of Quon v. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 4:03 pm
Since Chimel - many other cases have broadened this holding including the case of United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 6:16 am
Earlier this week, Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced the lawsuit of United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 5:36 pm
Apte v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 10:43 am
On April 10, in People of California v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 3:28 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 3:01 pm
And, in the third paragraph of your latest appeal, Judge Beezer describes your status for the reader with the following language:"Gadda has now been disbarred by the State of California, the BIA, the United States District Court for Northern District of California and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 7:36 am
Relying on its state constitution, the Iowa Supreme Court, in State v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
Worley have posted Evidence that the President is an "Officer of the United States" for Purposes of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment (Southern California Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
In Raven v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 1:51 pm
Here is an update on California versus overall United States crime rates. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 8:37 pm
In so doing, the Court agreed with Clair, not the State of California, as to the standard that should be applied. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 10:15 am
The decision, Chamber of Commerce of the United States et al. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:44 am
Cir. 2010), to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 11:23 am
At least for civil procedure nuts.Which matters, because the United States can only remove "interpleader" claims against it to federal court pursuant to 28 USC 2410.But the Ninth Circuit correctly holds that if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck . . . . [read post]
